Hong Kong’s Institutional Edge in a Fragmented World

Under the ongoing geopolitical impact, the increasing importance placed by countries on security risks in recent years has caused the global economic and trade landscape to shift from integrated free trade toward fragmentation. Amid this monumental change, China’s economy has demonstrated strong resilience, expediting its upgrade from the world’s factory to a technology powerhouse.


Professor Heiwai Tang and Mr Cyrus Cheung

22 April 2026

Under the ongoing geopolitical impact, the increasing importance placed by countries on security risks in recent years has caused the global economic and trade landscape to shift from integrated free trade toward fragmentation. Amid this monumental change, China’s economy has demonstrated strong resilience, expediting its upgrade from the world’s factory to a technology powerhouse. The overseas expansion of Chinese companies has become an international business trend and deeply integrated into the economic development and people’s lives around the world. This has not only created a window for Hong Kong’s third economic transformation but also provided an opportunity to achieve inclusive growth.

Currently, the SAR Government is formulating its five-year plan, taking the initiative to bid farewell to the traditional philosophy of “small government, big market”, and proactively leveraging Hong Kong’s institutional advantages under the “one country, two systems” policy. With the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area and the Belt and Road Initiative as entry points, Hong Kong is expected to become a “super value-adder” connecting the country’s new industries with global markets.

Hong Kong becoming a trustworthy platform in a multipolar world

The international political and economic landscape has shifted from a unipolar to a multipolar structure. From “America First” to the “New Washington Consensus” and to Trump’s global tariff hikes, America is moving further toward protectionism. To address risks, many companies have adopted the “China + 1” strategy of diversifying production footprints and the “America + 1” strategy of placing too much reliance on a single consumer market. This trend of resource reallocation has been significantly conducive to the growth of emerging economies such as ASEAN.

Meanwhile, China has demonstrated enormous influence in AI, advanced manufacturing, and new energy. US suppression policies have not only failed to stop China’s rise as an industrial powerhouse, but have instead pushed its supply chains towards high-end upgrading and internationalization through technological innovation and active overseas expansion.

In terms of international cooperation, while the Global North continues to dominate traditional international organizations, including the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, the Global South has been actively developing emerging institutions such as BRICS Plus, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank.

Amid the fragmentation of the economic and trade landscape, Hong Kong’s value as a service platform is especially indispensable. The “one country, two systems” framework provides the city with an understanding of socialism alongside deep familiarity with capitalism. As a special administrative region in China, Hong Kong operates under a common law system that is highly aligned with international business practices. Coupled with its long-established commercial reputation, economic and trade networks, and stable business environment, the SAR is set to become a trusted platform for cooperation among all parties.

A new path forward built on innovation, technology and internationalization

At the national level, the Mainland economy has shifted towards high-quality development in recent years, creating significant opportunities for Hong Kong to tap into new growth trajectories. In 2025, China’s total R&D expenditure approached RMB4 trillion, ranking firmly second in the world; the number of valid invention patents surpassed 5 million; and China topped the world ranking for six consecutive years in the number of international patent applications filed under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). Meanwhile, high-tech manufacturing enterprises above designated size, equipment manufacturing, digital product manufacturing, and clean energy power generation all recorded strong growth of approximately 9%. Evidently, the “new quality productive forces”, characterized by innovation, digitalization, and green development, are driving national economic growth.

Hong Kong is in a position to lend impetus in this regard. On the one hand, through its development into an international innovation and technology (I&T) centre, Hong Kong can attract high-end innovation resources from around the world, and add value in overcoming core technological challenges. On the other hand, by leveraging the strengths of its financial sector and growing into a regional intellectual property trading centre, the city can support the nation to enhance its capacity to commercialize intellectual property, and raise international capital for the nation’s technology and green industries. These measures will help expand the scope of Hong Kong’s high value-added services.

At present, the nation is actively fostering a new development pattern in which the domestic circulation serves as the mainstay and domestic and international circulations reinforce each other. In 2025, China’s total retail sales of consumer goods broke the RMB50 trillion mark, while services consumption accounted for more than 46% of per capita consumption expenditure. As the largest goods trading country in the world, China boasts total imports and exports of around RMB45.5 trillion, with trade with Belt and Road countries representing more than half of its total foreign trade. The export value of China’s high-tech products recorded an increase of over 13%, reaching nearly 20% of its total exports. Notably, exports of the “new three” products, i.e. new energy vehicles, lithium-ion batteries, and photovoltaic products, registered a whopping increase of approximately 27%.

The nation’s 15th Five-year Plan proposes building a modernized industrial system and a strong domestic market, while expanding high-level opening up. Its key priorities include promoting the high-quality and efficient development of the service sector, vigorously boosting consumption, expanding effective investment, and enhancing the quality and level of trade and investment cooperation. Given that Hong Kong possesses unique advantages of “one country, two systems” and international connectivity, its service industry is characterized by great potential. On the one hand, the Mainland’s consumption upgrading requires services that align with internationally leading quality standards. On the other hand, the nation’s continuously growing import and export trade will contribute to consolidating Hong Kong’s position as an international entrepot. In addition, the internationalization of the renminbi requires a convenient and trusted platform. As domestic green products going global is a prevailing trend, Hong Kong’s strengths in Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) certification and green finance will be brought fully into play.

Advancing a threefold upgrade of “super value-adder” services

In the face of the fragmented economic and trade landscape, during the 15th Five-year Plan period, Hong Kong must strengthen its role as a “super value-adder” and become an empowering platform that serves national development. Towards this end, the upgrade of financial services is the primary entry point. Offshore RMB business should not simply remain a tool for capital reserves; it should also serve to meet the investment and financing needs of the real economy. Through such measures as enriching RMB products, including RMB trading counters in the Southbound Stock Connect for Hong Kong stocks, and increasing the issuance of “dim sum bonds”, Hong Kong will be able to effectively enhance the liquidity and returns of offshore RMB, and expand its function as a global offshore RMB business hub.

In the process of its deep integration into the industrial chains of the Greater Bay Area, Hong Kong can play the role as an enabler. For example, it can build an international hub for scientific research talent upstream, focusing on tackling “bottleneck” technological challenges. In the midstream and downstream sectors, it can leverage international testing and certification services and trade networks to facilitate Chinese enterprises’ global expansion. In terms of supporting services, Hong Kong can add value to the Greater Bay Area’s industrial chain in such areas as intellectual property protection and commercialization, brand building, marketing, and trade financing. Local universities, as an engine for innovation in this process, can nurture professional talent equipped with an international outlook by providing researchers and students with a high-quality academic environment. Such talent will create industrial value in society by transforming basic research outcomes into high-quality products, complex international regulations into compliance processes, and ESG knowledge into corporate global reputation.

Hong Kong’s ability to play its role in “attracting capital and talent” hinges on its significant advantages in finance and higher education. Its internationally aligned financial system, coupled with a predictable investment environment for global capital, has undoubtedly made the city the preferred destination for international investors seeking to allocate funds to high-quality Chinese assets. Its world-renowned higher education is a magnet for the world’s top talent. As hubs for knowledge innovation and talent grooming, local universities can serve as the interface between high-quality international resources and national needs in such fields as economics and management, I&T, healthcare, and law. This would ultimately enhance the quality of Mainland products and services.

With China’s growing economic and technological strengths, it is only natural for Chinese enterprises to go global. However, in an era of global fragmentation, they are bound to face more challenges, particularly barriers stemming from cultural and institutional differences. Under “one country, two systems”, Hong Kong shares not only an affinity with overseas markets with respect to legal frameworks, business practices, and consumer habits, but also close connections with the Mainland, making it an ideal testing ground for the international expansion of Chinese enterprises. In addition to testing their business models in Hong Kong, Chinese companies can also boost their confidence in overseas expansion by gaining experience in cross-border operations and compliance.

Thanks to the strong support of the Central Government, various sectors in Hong Kong have been actively pursuing new development opportunities in recent years. It is our belief that Hong Kong will achieve a threefold upgrade: geographically—from the Global North to the Global South; functionally—from a gateway for connectivity to an empowering platform; and industrially—from finance to I&T and the green economy (see Note). In doing so, Hong Kong is well positioned to translate the opportunities presented by the current era into tangible economic growth, thereby creating quality employment opportunities for the general public.

Note: This concept was first introduced by the author, Heiwai Tang, in his article “對接「十五五」 善用全球大變局促進香港第三次經濟轉型”, published in Bauhinia Tribune on 27 March 2026.

Translation

以制度優勢破局全球碎片化時代

在地緣政治的持續衝擊下,近年各國日益重視安全風險,全球經貿格局從一體化自由貿易轉向碎片化。在此變局中,中國經濟展現強大韌性,加速從世界工廠升級為科技強國; 中企出海已成為國際商業趨勢,深度融入各地經濟發展與人民生活之中。這不僅為香港帶來了第三次經濟轉型的窗口,更提供了實現包容性增長的契機。

特區政府目前正編制「五年規劃」,主動告別「小政府、大市場」的傳統思維,積極發揮一國兩制下的制度優勢。香港以粵港澳大灣區及「一帶一路」作為切入點,可望成為連結國家新型工業與全球市場的「超級增值人」。

香港可成為多極化世界的可信平台

國際政經格局已由單極轉向多極化結構。從「美國優先」到「新華盛頓共識」,再到特朗普向全球徵稅,美國的保護主義傾向日益顯著。不少企業為應對風險,採取分散生產佈局的「中國+1」策略,以及避免依賴單一消費市場的「美國+1」策略。這種資源再分配的趨勢,顯著促進了東盟等新興經濟體的增長。

與此同時,中國在人工智能、先進製造及新能源等領域,已展現出舉足輕重的影響力。美國的壓制政策不但未能遏制中國崛起為工業強國,反而倒逼其供應鏈透過技術創新與積極出海,穩健邁向高端化及國際化。

在國際合作層面,全球北方繼續主導世界銀行、國際貨幣基金組織等傳統國際組織; 而全球南方則積極發展新興組織,例如「金磚+」、上海合作組織,以及亞洲基礎設施投資銀行等。

在經貿格局碎片化下,香港憑藉一國兩制基礎,既了解社會主義,亦熟悉資本主義,其服務價值更顯珍貴。作為中國境內的一個特別行政區,香港實行與國際商業範式高度接軌的普通法制度,加上多年來積累的商業聲譽、經貿網絡,以及穩定的營商環境,不難成為備受各方信賴的合作平台。

建基於創科及國際化實力的新路向

從國家層面看,近年內地經濟轉向高質量發展,為香港開拓新增長曲線帶來重大機遇。2025年,中國全社會研發經費接近 4 萬億元,穩居世界第二;有效發明專利突破500萬件;根據《專利合作條約》(Patent Cooperation Treaty;簡稱PCT)提出的國際專利申請量連冠6年。與此同時,規模以上高技術製造業、裝備製造業、數字產品製造業及清潔能源發電量均錄得約 9%的高增長。由此可見,以創新、數字、綠色為特徵的「新質生產力」正驅動國內經濟增長。

對此,香港可增添助力。一方面,透過建設國際創科中心,匯集國際高端創新要素,在攻克關鍵核心技術方面提供增值。另一方面,善用金融業優勢,建設區域知識產權貿易中心,服務國家提高知識產權變現能力,並為國家科技和綠色產業募集國際資金。這些舉措均有利於拓展本港高增值服務業的寬度。

當前國家正積極構建以國內大循環為主體、國內國際雙循環相互促進的新發展格局。2025 年,全國社會消費品零售總額突破 50 萬億元,服務性消費支出已佔居民人均消費支出逾 46%。作為全球貨物貿易第一大國,進出口總值約達 45.5 萬億元,與「一帶一路」國家的貿易佔比已過半。中國高技術產品的出口價值更錄得逾 13%的高增長,已佔出口總額近 20%,其中「新三樣」(新能源汽車、鋰電池、光伏) 的出口大增約 27%。

國家「十五五」規劃提出要建設現代化產業體系和強大國內市場,並擴大高水平對外開放。重點工作方針包括促進服務業優質高效發展、大力提振消費、擴大有效投資,以及提升貿易投資合作質量和水平等。香港擁有一國兩制與國際化獨特性,相信其服務業大有可為。一方面,內地消費升級需要國際領先的品質標準對接服務;另一方面,國家不斷增長的進出口貿易,有利於鞏固香港作為國際轉口港的地位。除此之外,人民幣國際化也需要一個便捷、值得信賴的平台。國內綠色商品走向世界是大勢所趨,香港在環境、社會及管治(Environmental, Social, and Governance;簡稱ESG )認證與綠色金融方面的優勢將會得到充分發揮。

推動「超級增值人」服務三重升級

面對環球碎片化經貿格局,香港在「十五五」時期須強化「超級增值人」角色,成為助力國家發展的賦能平台。為此,金融服務的升級是首要切入點。離岸人民幣業務不能僅停留在資金儲備功能,更應滿足實體經濟的投融資需求。透過豐富人民幣產品、將人民幣櫃台納入「港股通」及增發「點心債」等舉措,香港將有效提升離岸人民幣的流動性與收益率,擴大作為全球離岸人民幣業務樞紐的功能。

在深度融入大灣區產業鏈的過程中,香港可擔任賦能者角色。例如在上游建設國際科研人才高地,聚焦攻克「卡脖子」技術難題;在中游與下游,則憑藉國際化檢測認證服務和經貿網絡,助力中企佈局全球。在配套服務方面,從知識產權保障與商品化、品牌建設、市場營銷到貿易融資等,香港均可為灣區產業鏈增值。大學作為這一進程中的創新引擎,透過為研究人員和學生提供優質的學術環境,孕育具備國際化視野的專才。這些專才在社會中創造產業價值,將基礎研究成果轉化為優質產品,將複雜的國際法規轉化為合規流程,將ESG知識轉化為企業的全球聲譽。

香港之所以能發揮「引資引智」作用,實有賴於其在金融和高等教育等領域的顯著優勢。與國際接軌的金融體系,加上為全球資本提供可預期的投資環境,無疑令香港成為國際資金配置中國優質資產的首選地。而其蜚聲國際的高等教育,則是吸引全球頂尖人才的引力場。本地大學作為知識創新和人才培養的樞紐,能夠在經管、創科、醫療及法律等領域,擔當國際優質資源與國家需求之間的接口,最終可協助提升內地商品及服務的質量。

隨着中國經濟與科技實力與日俱增,中企走向世界雖是大勢所趨,但在全球碎片化時代中,也必然面臨更多挑戰,特別是文化與制度之間的隔閡。一國兩制下的香港,既在法律制度、商業慣例及消費者習慣等各方面與海外市場相似,又與內地關係緊密,足以成為中企出海的理想試點。中企不但可在香港試行商業模式,還可積累跨境運營與合規經驗,為出海增添信心。

近年香港各界在中央政府的鼎力支持下,均積極謀求新發展。筆者相信,香港定能完成區域(由全球北方延伸至全球南方)、功能(由聯繫窗口發展成賦能平台)及產業(由金融拓展至創科與綠色經濟)的三重升級【註】,將時代賦予的發展機遇轉化為實實在在的經濟增長,為廣大市民創造優質的就業機會。

【註】:筆者鄧希煒於《紫荊論壇》2026年3月27日發表《對接「十五五」 善用全球大變局促進香港第三次經濟轉型》一文中,首次提出此一概念。

鄧希煒教授
香港大學協理副校長、港大經管學院副院長、馮國經馮國綸基金經濟學教授

張超藝先生
香港大學香港經濟及商業策略研究所高級研究助理

(本文同時於二零二六年四月二十二日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)