A Critical Moment for the Third Economic Transformation: Starting with the Four Pillar Industries

Hong Kong is a highly developed economy with close to 94% of its gross domestic product (GDP) generated by the service sector. However, in the current service sector structure lies a “binary structure trap”.


Professor Heiwai Tang and Mr Cyrus Cheung

25 February 2026

Hong Kong is a highly developed economy with close to 94% of its gross domestic product (GDP) generated by the service sector. However, in the current service sector structure lies a “binary structure trap”. On the one hand, high-value-added services with scarce employment opportunities; on the other, mass-market sectors with relatively low value added (see Table). This reflects that Hong Kong needs to strengthen the development of high-value-added service industries capable of creating broad employment opportunities.

Table  Overview of Hong Kong’s four pillar industries in 2024

 

Value added per person (HK$)

 

Share in GDP

 

Share in total employment

 

Financial services

 

3.08 million

26.2%7.2%
 

Trading and logistics

 

1.06 million

18.9%15.0%
 

Professional and producer services

 

550,000

10.3%15.8%
 

Tourism

 

540,000

2.8%4.3%

Source: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong SAR Government

The financial sector: growth led by banking talent

Between 2000 and 2024, the financial sector stood out from the rest, with its share in Hong Kong’s GDP more than doubling from 12.8% to 26.2%, while its share in total employment edged up from 5.3% to 7.2%. In 2024, the financial sector’s value added per person reached $3.08 million, far higher than that of other sectors, giving rise to a small group of wealthy elites.

Across the sub-sectors, banking is consistently the main engine of growth. Between 2011 and 2024, its GDP share more than doubled from 9.3% to 18.9%. By contrast, its share in the overall employment remained broadly stable at around 2.6% to 2.7%, clearly showing that the banking boom has little connection with the employment market.

In comparison, in 2024, other financial services—including stockbroking, asset management, finance leasing companies, as well as investment and holding companies—accounted for 2.7% of overall employment, slightly higher than that of the banking sector at 2.6%. Yet their GDP share was only 3.9%, far below banking’s 18.9%, indicating a clear binary structure within the financial sector itself. As for the insurance sector, its share in total employment and GDP were 1.9% and 3.5% respectively.

Buoyed by foreign investors’ confidence in China’s technological development , as well as their expectation that consumption will emerge from deflation, Hong Kong’s financial sector remains promising. Looking ahead, Central will still be the premier meeting point for foreign capital and domestic-funded enterprises in the Mainland. Amid the wave of Mainland companies going global, the financial sector will continue to generate substantial value added for the local economy, bringing in considerable tax revenue. As a matter of fact, after several years of downward trend, the financial sector has been revived to its former glory. Between the end of 2023 and the end of 2025, the total market capitalization of Hong Kong stocks surged from $31 trillion to $47.4 trillion; the total equity funds raised skyrocketed from $156 billion to $644.4 billion, of which the initial public offering (IPO) proceeds surged from $46.3 billion to $285.8 billion.

Trading and logistics: caught in a growth impasse

Trading and logistics used to be the largest sector but its share in GDP fell from 28.5% in 2005 to 18.9% in 2024, while its share in total employment dropped from 24.4% to 15.0%. Part of the reason is the rise of e-commerce and the “China + 1” strategy undertaken by companies in response to geopolitical factors, which has weakened Hong Kong’s function as an entrepot. Nevertheless, this sector still ranks second in both GDP share and employment share.

Breaking the data down, between 2005 and 2024, the share of trading in GDP decreased from 23.4% to 15.3%, while its share in total employment fell from 18.6% to 10.4%. During the same period, the logistics industry, which is intricately tied to the trading sector, also showed a downward trend, with its GDP share declining from 5.1% to 3.6% and its share in total employment shrinking from 5.8% to 4.6%. With the development of digital trading platforms, intelligent warehousing systems, and high-value-added supply chain management, the trading and logistics sector is expected to shift from labour-intensive to capital- and technology-intensive, which may further put pressure on the labour market.

In terms of freight transport modes, excluding the COVID-19 pandemic period, in recent years, the shares of air and land transport have generally remained above 40%, while that of sea transport has continued to fall to below 10%. This reflects, on the one hand, the focus of Hong Kong on re-export of high-value added goods such as semiconductors, electronics, and  biopharmaceuticals, and, on the other hand, the close economic and trade relations between Hong Kong and the Mainland.

For many years, Hong Kong International Airport has been ranked as the world’s busiest international cargo airport, with cargo throughput reaching 5.07 million tonnes in 2025. Leveraging its efficient air logistics network, Hong Kong is gradually transforming into a global distribution centre for key intermediate products and core technologies, further deepening its ties with advanced manufacturing and innovation-driven value chains.

Judging from the data, the local maritime sector is clearly under pressure. The container throughput at the port of Hong Kong shrank from 20.07 million TEUs in 2015 to 12.91 million TEUs in 2025. According to the World Shipping Council, the SAR’s container throughput dived to 12th place globally in 2024. The reasons for this were, first, the city’s difficulty in maintaining its efficiency premium amid infrastructure upgrades and cost advantages in neighbouring port cities in recent years. The second reason is the effects of near-shoring and regionalization of supply chains. Notwithstanding these challenges, Hong Kong is actively seizing development opportunities in high-end maritime services such as maritime finance and shipping management.

Professional and producer services: confronting cut-throat competition and AI replacement

The professional and producer services sector showed a paradoxical divergence, with its GDP share declining from 12.5% in 2016 to 10.3% in 2024, but its share in overall employment rising from 14% to 15.8% over the same period. This suggests that the sector’s labour market may be trending towards “involution-style” competition.

Breaking this down, between 2000 and 2024, the GDP share of producer services (excluding professional services) dropped from 7.2% to 5.7%, while its share in total employment rose from 7.3% to 8.9%. The GDP share of professional services increased from 3.3% to 4.6%, while its share in total employment climbed from 3.9% to 6.9%.

As is well known, senior practitioners in professional services have always enjoyed generous compensation. The phenomenon that the sector’s share in overall employment is higher than its GDP share may reflect the fact that professional services involve a large number of junior positions responsible for standardized, repetitive work. Add to this the trends of “involution-style” competition plus artificial intelligence (AI) replacing white-collar work, and the vast ranks of junior practitioners may soon face a harsh winter.

Tourism: hopes for a full recovery

Given its marked economic spillover effects, tourism is often regarded as an important component of the economy. The golden era of Hong Kong’s tourism started with the introduction of the Individual Visit Scheme in 2003, allowing Mainland residents to visit Hong Kong on an individual basis. Visitor arrivals soared from 21.81 million in 2004 to a record high of 65.15 million in 2018, while total tourist consumption multiplied from $66.8 billion to $272.3 billion. However, this growth momentum came to an abrupt halt in 2019.

In the post-pandemic era, Hong Kong’s tourism industry has yet to fully recover. In 2024, tourism accounted for 4.3% in GDP and 2.8% in total employment, lower than the corresponding figures of 7.3% and 5% in 2013, when the sector was at its peak. Although visitor arrivals to Hong Kong rebounded to about 45.2 million (or approximately 70% of the peak level) in the same year, more than half were non-overnight visitors, whose in-destination consumption spending amounted to $27.9 billion, far less than that of overnight visitors at $120.5 billion. This phenomenon of “high headcount but low consumption” not only reveals a slow recovery in higher value-added long-haul travellers, but may also suggest that non-overnight visitor data includes cross-border commuters, a group that has emerged in recent years.

Looking ahead, as the SAR Government vigorously promotes the mega-events economy and infrastructure such as major local venues continues to improve, the community has high hopes that the local tourism industry will regain its past vitality. In 2025, visitor arrivals to Hong Kong rebounded to around 49.9 million, already showing clear signs of recovery.

Leveraging financial strengths to drive economic transformation

Looking back at Hong Kong’s economic development over the past 20-odd years, the city’s four pillar industries are clearly struggling to create a broad range of quality employment opportunities. Although the financial sector (banking in particular) has grown in leaps and bounds, making significant contributions to the local economy and tax revenue, it has brought about employment opportunities for only a small group of elites. The trading and logistics sector still makes important contributions to GDP and employment, but its development outlook is not encouraging. In addition, the professional and producer services sector has not only fallen into a predicament of “a declining share in GDP and a rising share in overall employment”, but is also facing the impact of AI replacing white-collar jobs. As for tourism, despite signs of recovery, shifting consumption patterns may make it difficult for the sector to return to its former peak.

There are various signs to suggest that Hong Kong urgently needs to develop a more inclusive model of economic development, so that the prosperity of its financial sector can drive productivity improvements across different industries. For example, the relative success of green finance should continue to help Hong Kong become an important engine of green economic transformation in the region. Going forward, efforts should continue to focus on exploring how the financial sector can support economic activities such as trade finance, digital trade, technology research and development, and intellectual property financing.

As a mature economy, Hong Kong also needs to develop more high-value-added service industries. GDP growth is not necessarily the only measure of a happy society; the growth of new industries, which can create quality employment opportunities, also deserves attention. The key to achieving the third economic transformation and inclusive growth for Hong Kong in the next decade hinges on the future success of the innovation and technology industry. Its significance lies not only in the “prosperity” generated by GDP growth, but also in the “stability” of society’s overall sense of well-being.

Translation

第三次經濟轉型關鍵時刻:從四大支柱產業說起

香港是一個高度發達的經濟體,其本地生產總值(GDP)近94% 均來源於服務業。然而,在現時的服務業結構下,存在一個「二元結構陷阱」:一方面是就業機會稀缺的高附加值行業;另一方面則是附加值較低的大眾行業【表】。這反映香港需要加強發展能夠提供廣泛就業機會的高增值服務業。

表   2024年香港四大支柱行業概況

人均增加價值(港元)GDP比例佔總就業人數比例
金融服務308萬26.2%7.2%
貿易及物流106萬18.9%15.0%
專業服務及其他工商業支援服務55萬10.3%15.8%
旅遊54萬2.8%4.3%

數據來源: 香港特區政府統計處

金融業:銀行精英驅動增長

2000 至 2024 年期間,金融業一枝獨秀,佔香港GDP 比例從 12.8% 翻倍至 26.2%,但佔全港就業人數比率僅從5.3%微升至 7.2%。2024年,金融業的人均增加價值高達308萬元,遠高於其他行業,形成了一小撮富裕精英。

從各子行業看,銀行業始終是引領增長的火車頭,2011至2024年期間,其GDP佔比由9.3%翻倍至18.9%;反觀其佔總就業人數的比例始終穩定在2.6%至2.7%左右,清晰反映銀行業蓬勃與就業市場關係不大。

相較之下,2024年,其他金融服務(包括證券經紀、資產管理、融資租賃公司和投資及控股公司) 佔整體就業人數2.7%,略高於銀行業的2.6%;但其GDP佔比只有3.9%,遠低於銀行業的18.9%,可見金融業內部也存在明顯的二元結構。至於保險業,其就業人數和GDP佔比分別為1.9%和3.5%。

受惠於近期外資對中國科技發展的信心乃至消費走出通縮的寄望,香港金融業的發展仍然值得期待。展望將來,中環仍是外國資本和內資企業的最佳交匯地,金融業在內資企業的出海浪潮中,將持續為本地經濟創造龐大增值,並帶來可觀稅收。事實上,在經歷數年低潮後,金融業已重拾繁榮。2023年底至2025 年底,港股總市值由31萬億元大漲至47.4 萬億元;股份集資總額由1,560億元飆升至6,444億元,其中首次公開招股(IPO)集資額由463億元暴漲至2,858億元。

貿易及物流:陷入增長困境

貿易及物流曾是第一大產業,其GDP佔比由2005年的28.5%降至 2024 年的 18.9%,佔總就業人口比例則由24.4%下跌至15.0%。部分原因在於電商興起,以及地緣政治因素驅使企業採取「中國+1」策略,導致本港轉口功能弱化。儘管如此,該產業的GDP佔比和就業人數佔比仍位居次席。

分拆來看,2005至2024年期間,貿易業的GDP佔比由23.4%減至15.3%,就業人數佔比由18.6%下降至10.4%。同期,與貿易業深度綁定的物流業同樣呈現下降趨勢,其GDP佔比由5.1%下降至3.6%,就業人數佔比由5.8%跌至4.6%。隨着數字貿易平台、智能倉儲系統和高增值供應鏈管理的發展,預料貿易及物流業將由勞動密集型轉向資本與技術密集型,這或進一步對就業市場造成壓力。

在貨運方式而言,不計新冠疫情期間,近年航空和陸路的份額同樣大致維持在40%以上,而海運份額則持續降至不足10%。一方面反映香港集中轉口半導體、電子產品、生物製藥等高增值商品,另一方面反映香港與內地之間經貿關係緊密。

香港國際機場多年被列作全球最繁忙的國際貨運機場,貨運量於2025年已高達 507 萬公噸。憑藉高效的航空物流網絡,香港正逐步轉型為全球關鍵中間產品與核心技術的分撥中心,持續深化其與先進製造業和創新驅動型價值鏈的連結。

從數據上看,本地海運業無疑陷入困境。港口貨櫃吞吐量從2015年的2,007 萬個標準貨櫃單位萎縮至 2025 年的1,291 萬個。根據世界航運理事會 (World Shipping Council) ,香港的港口貨櫃吞吐量於2024年下滑至全球第12位。究其原因,一是近年鄰近港口城市憑藉基建升級和成本優勢,使香港難以維持效率溢價;二是受到近岸外包和供應鏈區域化所影響。儘管如此,香港仍正在積極把握海事金融、航運管理等高端航運服務的發展機遇。

專業服務及其他工商業支援服務:面臨內捲化與 AI 替代挑戰

專業服務及其他工商支援服務業呈現出弔詭的背離現象,其 GDP 佔比由 2016 年的12.5%持續降至2024年的10.3%,但同期佔總就業人數比例則從14%升至15.8%,反映該行業的勞工市場或存在內捲化趨勢。

分拆來看,2000至2024年期間,工商業支援服務(專業服務除外)的GDP佔比由7.2%降至5.7%,佔總就業人數比例卻由7.3%升至8.9%。專業服務的GDP佔比由3.3%增至4.6%,佔總就業人數比例亦由3.9%攀升至6.9%。

眾所周知,專業服務高級從業員的待遇向來豐厚。總就業人數佔比高於GDP佔比的現象,或反映專業服務業包含大量負責標準化、重複性工作的初級職位。在內捲化疊加人工智能(AI)取代白領工作的趨勢下,廣大初級從業員恐怕即將面對凜冬。

旅遊業:憧憬全面復甦

由於具備顯著的經濟外溢效應,旅遊業往往被視為經濟的重要組成部分。香港旅遊業的黃金時代始於 2003 年內地開放「自由行」,遊客量從 2004 年的 2,181 萬人次激增至 2018 年 6,515 萬人次的歷史巔峰,消費總額亦由 668 億元大翻數倍至 2,723 億元。然而,此一增長勢頭在2019 年戛然而止。

在後疫情時代,香港旅遊業並未完全復甦。2024年,旅遊業佔GDP 與總就業比例分別為 4.3% 與 2.8%,遜於 2013 年全盛時期的7.3%和5%。儘管同年訪港旅客回升至約 4,520 萬人次(或高峰期的 70%左右),但其中過半為不過夜旅客,其境內消費開支為279億元,遠低於過夜旅客的1,205億元。這種「人頭多、消費低」的現象,既顯示較高增值的長途旅客復甦緩慢,亦可能意味着不過夜旅客的數據混雜了近年興起的跨境通勤者。

展望將來,随着特區政府大力推行盛事經濟和本地大型場館等基建愈趨完善,社會熱切期待旅遊業能夠重拾昔日興旺。2025年,訪港旅客進一步回升至約4,990萬人次,已展現出積極的復甦勢頭。

發揮金融優勢  促成經濟轉型

回顧近20多年的經濟發展,香港四大支柱行業在廣泛創造優質就業機會方面,已盡顯疲態。金融業(特別是銀行業)雖高歌猛進,為本地經濟和公共稅收作出巨大貢獻,但同時僅能為極少數精英提供就業機會。貿易及物流業雖仍為GDP和就業作出重要貢獻,但發展趨勢未許樂觀。此外,專業服務及其他工商業支援服務業不單陷入「GDP佔比降、就業佔比升」的內捲化困局,還面臨 AI 取代白領職位的衝擊。旅遊業雖見復甦,但消費模式的轉變或使其難回巔峰。

種種跡象預示,香港亟須建立一個更具包容性的經濟發展模式,讓金融業的繁榮帶動各行各業生產力的提升。例如已相對成功的綠色金融,應持續助力香港成為區內綠色經濟轉型的重要引擎。今後仍須聚焦探索金融業如何支持貿易融資、數字貿易,以及科技研發、知識產權融資等經濟活動。

香港作為一個成熟經濟體,亦需要開拓更多高增值服務業。GDP增長未必是衡量幸福社會的唯一指標;新型工業的增長能為社會創造優質就業機會,亦應予以重視。創科產業的成敗,決定香港未來10年能否實現第3次經濟轉型和包容性增長,其意義不止於GDP增長的「繁榮」,更關乎整體社會獲得感的「穩定」。

鄧希煒教授
香港大學協理副校長、港大經管學院副院長、馮國經馮國綸基金經濟學教授

張超藝先生
香港大學香港經濟及商業策略研究所高級研究助理

黃鈺琪女士
香港大學香港經濟及商業策略研究所研究助理

(本文同時於二零二六年二月二十五日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)