Do we still remember the military yen?

On 7 December 1941, at 7.55 a.m. Hawaiian time, Japan launched a surprise attack on the American naval base at Pearl Harbour, prompting the UK and the US to declare war on Japan and leading to the outbreak of the Pacific War. Subsequent to the invasion of China, Imperial Japan methodically escalated the war across…


On 7 December 1941, at 7.55 a.m. Hawaiian time, Japan launched a surprise attack on the American naval base at Pearl Harbour, prompting the UK and the US to declare war on Japan and leading to the outbreak of the Pacific War. Subsequent to the invasion of China, Imperial Japan methodically escalated the war across the Asia-Pacific, pillaging resources throughout the region to achieve its objective of “sustaining war with war”. In fact, the Japanese militarists launched attacks on Malaya (present-day Malaysia) over an hour before their assault on Pearl Harbour, then began to make inroads into regions such as Hong Kong, the Philippines, Singapore, and Guam. Despite its firm resistance to Japanese aggression starting at  8 o’clock on the morning of 8 December 1941, Hong Kong fell on Christmas day of the same month, marking the beginning of three years and eight months of cruelty and hardship.

On the second day of its occupation of Hong Kong, Japan announced the issuance of the military yen to replace the Hong Kong dollar, which was then pegged to the pound sterling. Supported by reserves in British pounds, the exchange rate stood at one British pound to 16 Hong Kong dollars. However, the military yen was not backed by any metal assets or foreign reserves and could therefore be overissued at will. Produced at minimal cost, this Japanese currency could nonetheless be used to purchase goods at full face value on the market, providing Imperial Japan with a means to pillage resources. Furthermore, as the Hong Kong dollar was backed by foreign reserves and could thus circulate within the region, military yen converted into Hong Kong dollars could then be deployed to obtain goods from other economies. In this way, Japan’s use of military scrip to seize resources from occupied territories also eliminated the cost of shipping supplies to overseas war zones.

The issuance of Hong Kong dollars has always adhered to the currency board system, which requires that all cash, including banknotes and coins, be 100% backed by metal assets or foreign reserves at a fixed exchange rate before entering circulation. Following the Japanese occupation of Hong Kong, the Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation was found to be in possession of a huge amount of Hong Kong banknotes ready for circulation but had not yet been backed by foreign reserves. However, in order to seize these resources, the Japanese military forced the HSBC to issue the banknotes despite the lack of foreign reserves. This was probably the only occasion in Hong Kong’s monetary history when Hong Kong dollar banknotes were issued without following the currency board system. The shortfall in foreign reserves was of course subsequently made up in full through the investment returns of the Exchange Fund.

Initially, in December 1941, the military yen was put into circulation alongside the Hong Kong dollar at an exchange rate of one to one. However, in January 1942, the exchange rate was revised to one military yen to two Hong Kong dollars, meaning the Hong Kong dollar was devalued. Since the military scrip had neither the backing of reserves nor public trust, Hong Kong dollars continued to be used mainly for market transactions, while goods were mostly priced in Hong Kong dollars. The real purchasing power of one military yen was lower than that of two Hong Kong dollars. For example, unless under severe regulatory restrictions, a product priced at six dollars would require more than three military yen to purchase. The fact that the market value was lower than the nominal value gave rise to a black market. The black market exchange rates were subject to fluctuations in people’s confidence in the value of the military yen and in the strictness of regulation. These fluctuations, in turn, fuelled speculation and arbitrage, thus exacerbating the chaos of the wartime economy.

In July 1942, the military government devalued the Hong Kong dollar to a rate of one military yen to four Hong Kong dollars, causing greater losses for locals who persisted in holding Hong Kong currency. In June 1943, with a view to tightening monetary control and intensifying the extraction of local resources, Japan pushed forward the replacement of the Hong Kong dollar by designating the military yen as the city’s sole “fiat” currency. The collection and circulation of Hong Kong dollars, gold, and foreign currencies were prohibited, while foreign currency trading was permitted only at designated exchanges. Violators were liable to severe punishment or even the death penalty. Nevertheless, due to their acceptance on the international market, Hong Kong dollars were not entirely wiped off, and a black market for them still remained.

Given that the military scrip was issued at minimal cost and without proper regulation, the power to issue it could easily be abused, causing its supply to snowball. Coupled with Hong Kong’s heavy dependence on external supplies and the extreme shortage of resources during wartime, this inevitably set off vicious inflation. Moreover, the military yen was not trusted or welcomed by Hong Kong people, who sought to dispose of it quickly, thereby accelerating its circulation. This was also one of the factors of rising prices. The higher the prices, the lower the purchasing power of the military scrip, which became even less acceptable. Barter, in turn, gradually emerged as the preferred way of doing business. In the absence of a common medium of exchange on the market, economic efficiency steadily deteriorated.

Food is the foremost necessity for the general populace. Using the price of rice as an indicator for living standards, online data show that at the end of 1941, a catty of rice cost about HK$0.13. By mid 1945, the price already surged to 100 military yen. As the Hong Kong dollar was out of circulation during that period, it had no official price. Assuming the exchange rate had remained at one military yen to four Hong Kong dollars, one catty of rice would have cost HK$400, an expensive price even by today’s standards. That said, the continued over-issuance of military yen would have severely depreciated its value by 1945. Suppose the exchange rate had declined to one military yen to HK$0.4, a catty of rice would still have cost HK$40. The fact that the price of rice skyrocketed from HK$0.13 to HK$40 within 2.5 years illustrates how difficult life was for people at the time.

The exorbitant price was one problem, but another was that even if people were willing to pay, they could not necessarily obtain rice, as food shortages had made it necessary to implement a rice rationing system. Locals were required to line up at rationing stations to buy rice with coupons. Initially, each person could purchase 6.4 taels of rice per day. As food became scarcer, the amount they could buy decreased even further, and a rice coupon was no guarantee of getting the rice they needed. That is where the local saying “lining up for rice” originated. In the latter stage of the World War, the food shortage in Hong Kong was so severe that countless people died from starvation or malnutrition, and newspapers even reported incidents of cannibalism. This breakdown of law and order deepened the local community’s resentment towards the Japanese invaders. To mitigate resistance and relieve pressure from food shortages, the Japanese military introduced a so-called “homeward bound” policy in 1942, forcing Hong Kong residents to relocate to Mainland China. With no transportation available, walking north was the only option for the majority. Burdened with aging parents and young children, many perished on the arduous journey.

Another effect of the military yen on the Hong Kong economy at the time manifested itself in trade. The fact that both the Hong Kong dollar and foreign exchange were illegalized from 1943 onwards while the military yen in Hong Kong could not circulate elsewhere created tremendous challenges to the city’s trade settlement, making it extremely difficult for the city to conduct trade with the outside world through legal channels. Resources could only come in and out of Hong Kong through the black market while goods could only be exchanged by barter. Hong Kong being a trading hub all along, trading contraction inevitably spurred economic contraction for the city.

Banknotes are rightfully considered an asset to the holders and a liability to their issuers. By the same token, the military yen represented a debt owed by Japan to the people of Hong Kong. However, since the so-called “cessation of war” on 15 August 1945, the Japanese government has neither exchanged nor compensated for the military yen issued in Hong Kong. Hence a large quantity of the military yen was reduced to worthless paper overnight, causing those who held military yen out of fear of holding Hong Kong dollars to instantly lose all their assets. Over the years, many victims have sought compensation and some even appealed in person to the Tokyo District Court and High Court, but all to no avail. The Japanese government’s stance on the military yen mirrors its position on the invasion of China and other Asian nations: a brazen sense of entitlement to wanton plunder, coupled with and a lofty yet irresponsible and evasive attitude. Yet we will never forget.

Translation

香港還記得日圓軍票禍害嗎?


1941年12月7日夏威夷時間早上7時55分,日本偷襲珍珠港美國海軍基地,英國和美國隨即向日本宣戰,太平洋戰爭爆發。如侵略中國一樣,日本軍國主義者有計劃地擴展亞太區戰事,掠奪各地的資源,來達到所謂「以戰養戰」的目的。事實上,在偷襲珍珠港之前一個多小時,他們已發動對馬來亞(今馬來西亞)的進攻,而之後即分別進攻香港、菲律賓、新加坡 、關島等地。12月8日早上8時,日軍進攻香港,香港堅守至12月25日聖誕日淪陷,開始了三年零八個月的艱苦歲月。

日本攻佔香港後的第二天,便宣佈發行日圓軍用手票(簡稱軍票),取代流通中的港元。當時港元以英鎊為本位,背後有英鎊儲備支持,匯率是1英鎊兌16港元。相反,日本軍票的發行沒有任何金屬或外匯儲備作支持,因此可以隨意濫發。軍票的印刷成本微不足道,卻可在市場購買同等面值的商品,這正是日本軍國主義者掠奪資源的一個方法。除了當地的資源外,由於港元有外匯作儲備和因此而來的區內流通性,發行軍票兌換港元後,可用港元換取其他經濟體的產品。此外,以軍票挪用佔領區的物資,也可省卻從日本運輸物資至海外戰區的成本。

港元發鈔一直沿用的貨幣發行局制度,要求所有現金,包括鈔票和硬幣,在開始流入市場時,先有按固定匯率所需的金屬或外匯作百分百的儲備。日軍佔領香港後,發現匯豐銀行内有大量的港元鈔票。這些都是先印刷好,準備日後在市場流通的鈔票,暫時未有外匯儲備支持。但日軍為了佔用資源,強迫匯豐銀行在沒有外匯儲備的情況下仍然發行這些鈔票。這大概是香港貨幣史上唯一沒有遵守貨幣發行局制度的港元發鈔 。當然,所欠缺的外匯儲備,都在日後通過外匯基金的投資回報全數補回來。

日圓軍票發行初期和港元並行流通,兩者間匯率在1941年12月剛開始時為1兌1,但翌年1月即改為為1日圓軍票兌2港元,也就是港元貶值。由於軍票沒有儲備支持,亦不獲香港市民信任,市場交易仍以港元為主,商品也多以港元定價。1日圓軍票的實際購買力,低於2港元的購買力。因此,若一件商品的價格為6港元的話,買方要付高於3日圓軍票才能買到,除非有嚴格的監管限制。換句話說,市場賦予的價值低於面值,黑市便應運而生。黑市匯率受到市民對軍票價值的信心和監管的嚴厲程度而波動,波動衍生投機和套利行為,增加戰時經濟的混亂。

1942年7月,日據「政府」將港元貶值至1日圓軍票兌4港元,增加了那些堅持持有港元為資產的市民的損失。1943年6月,日本要加強管制貨幣和掠奪資源,更進一步取締港元,軍票成為唯一「法定」貨幣。港元以及黃金和外匯都不能收藏或流通,外幣買賣只可以在指定的交易所進行,違反的會被嚴刑處罰甚至處死。但由於港元在國際市場仍然受到認可,因此沒有完全消失,甚至仍然有黑市交易。

軍票發行屬無本生利,在沒有制約的環境下,發鈔權容易被濫用,軍票供應就越來越多,再加上倚靠外來物資供應的香港,在戰爭中難免資源匱乏,惡性通脹自然應運而生 。此外,由於軍票不被信任和接受,收到軍票的都會盡快將之轉手,增加貨幣流通速度,也是物價上升的一個因素。物價上升到某一個程度,軍票的購買力越來越低,也越來越不被接受,交易逐漸變為以物換物。市場上沒有了通用的交換媒介,經濟效率也就每況愈下。

民以食為天,若以白米的價格代表生活水平,按網上的資料,在1941年底,香港一斤白米的價格約為0.13港元,但到1945年中,價格已經上升到約100日圓軍票。1945年時,港元已不能在香港流通,所以沒有正式的港元價格。若1日圓軍票仍然兌換之前的4港元的話,那一斤白米便需要400港元,即使在今天仍然相當昂貴。不過,由於軍票持續濫發,到1945年軍票兌港元應該貶值很多,若1日圓軍票兌換0.4港元,那一斤白米也要40港元。白米價格在兩年半內從每斤0.13元升至40元,市民生活的困難可想而知。

價格高是一個問題,另一個問題是即使付高價也未必買到,因為當時香港由於糧食短缺而實行白米配給,市民需要購米票到白米配給所輪候購買。配額初期是每人每天六兩四白米,但後來配額減少了。由於糧食供應也下降,有購米票也未必買到,市民便一早到配給所門口排隊,因而有上一輩港人「輪米」的用語。到戰爭後期,香港糧食短缺的情況越趨嚴重,因飢餓或營養不良而死亡的不計其數,報紙亦有不少人吃人的消息。情況到這地步,社會治安自然惡劣,港人對日軍的抵抗情緒亦上升。為了減少抵抗和良食短缺的壓力,日軍早在1942年已實施所謂「歸鄉政策」,強迫港人回到內地。基於當時的交通環境,多數人都要扶老攜幼徒步北上,其中未到終點的大有人在。

軍票對香港經濟的另一個影響,表現在外貿方面。因港元和外匯在1943年後被非法化,而香港的日圓軍票又不可以在香港以外流通,使香港的外貿支付困難重重,難以通過合法渠道與外面通商。物資進出香港,或需通過黑市和以物換物的方式進行。香港本來就是一個貿易樞紐,貿易額萎縮自然也是經濟的萎縮。

鈔票理應是持有者的資產和發行者的負債,軍票自然也應該是日本對香港市民的欠債。但1945年8月15日,日本政府在所謂「停戰」後,對在香港曾經發行的軍票既不兌換也不賠償,大量的軍票瞬即成為廢紙,使那些之前不敢持有港元只持有軍票的港人一下子財產盡失。多年來港人都努力索償,亦有到東京地方法院和高等法院控告日本政府要求賠償,但都不得要領。日本政府對香港軍票的態度,和日本政府對侵略中國和亞洲其他國家的態度如出一轍,就是高高在上、恣意掠奪、不負責任、不敢面對。當然,我們都不會忘記。

陸炎輝博士
港大經管學院經濟學榮譽副教授

(本文同時於二零二五年九月三日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)