Reinstate Crypto Mining to Facilitate China’s Transition to Carbon Neutrality

Could cryptocurrency mining have become a driving force for carbon reduction in China? As the global cryptocurrency market rapidly expanded, mining evolved into a billion-dollar industry. However, its high energy consumption attracted criticism and was a key reason for the Chinese government’s ban on mining in 2021. Despite this, Prof. Guojun He highlighted that appropriate…


Professor Guojun He

26 March 2025

As of early 2025, the global cryptocurrency market was valued at over US$3 trillion (see Note 1). Cryptocurrency has made a leap from a specialized domain with a minority following in its early days to a global financial ecosystem. Unlike traditional financial markets, the cryptocurrency market operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week and transcends borders. At present, hundreds of publicly listed companies, hedge funds, family offices, and pension funds have invested in crypto assets. In July 2024, the BITCOIN Act was introduced in the US to establish a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, underscoring the status of cryptocurrency as a strategically significant asset class.

Meanwhile, crypto mining is similarly an international industry worth billions of US dollars. To date, at least 13 crypto mining companies have been listed on the NASDAQ Index in the US, facilitating the creation of emerging industrial chains characterized by specialization and scale. From the production of specialized mining hardware and large-scale mining operations, to electricity trading and carbon credit management, crypto mining has evolved into a hybrid industry that integrates energy, technology, and finance, far beyond mere computation. With technological advancements and increasingly clear regulatory conditions, the cryptocurrency market is set to expand its influence in the world financial system and to play an even more important role in the international monetary system in future.

However, according to frequent media reports, the energy consumption of crypto mining is equivalent to that of a medium-sized country. This has not only made the industry the enemy of environmental protection but was also part of the reason the Beijing government imposed a carpet ban on it in 2021, citing “high energy consumption and carbon emissions; low contribution to the national economy; limited impact as a driving force for industrial development and technological advancement; and the detrimental effects of its unmonitored and chaotic growth on promoting high-quality economic and social development as well as energy saving and carbon reduction”. Meanwhile, latest research studies illustrate that under a properly-designed policy for electricity prices, crypto mining is likely to benefit the expansion of renewable energy and the reduction of overall carbon emissions. Prior to 2021, China had been the world’s largest crypto mining centre, accounting for over 65% of the global mining hashrate (see Note 2). In May of the same year, the National Development and Reform Commission and other government departments jointly announced plans to comprehensively crack down on and prohibit crypto mining (see Note 3). The considerations underlying the decision were the pressure of energy consumption on the objectives of “dual energy consumption control”, the need for financial risk management, and concerns over carbon emissions. Crypto mining activities were then transferred to the US, Kazakhstan, etc. In early 2025, the US became the biggest crypto mining market while legitimate crypto mining activities almost disappeared in China.

Utilizing excess renewable power

Crypto mining can help carbon emissions mitigation in that it encompasses three key features of renewable energy: high fixed cost of initial development; low marginal cost of electricity generation; and imperfect correlation between electricity supply and demand. Not only do these features hamper market potential but the grid systems would be affected if they are not flexible enough. In addition, given the “memoryless” nature of mining activities (i.e. no disruption to mining operations after shutting down and restarting within a very short time), they can serve as an ideal “adjustment device” for renewable energy power grids, compensating for the supply and demand imbalance of renewable energy. Such a mechanism can benefit the rapid development of renewable energy infrastructure in the Chinese Mainland.

While the National 14th Five-Year Plan affirms the goals of substantially accelerating the installation of clean energy infrastructure, including wind and solar power, the development of renewable energy faces the challenge of an “oversupply of wind, solar, and hydroelectric energy”. Despite China’s global dominance in installed capacity of renewable energy in 2024, the oversupply rate of solar energy in some regions had exceeded 10% while that of wind energy had reached up to 15% (see Note 4), causing severe wastage of clean energy and even resulting in negative power prices. Integrating crypto mining into the power grid adjustment system not only absorbs and utilizes surplus power but also overcomes the volatility of renewable energy, stabilizes grid operations, and generates economic benefits.

With a proper electricity pricing policy, introducing crypto mining can enhance investment in renewable energy production and curb overall carbon emissions under suitable conditions. In Western China, where energy resources are abundant, the adoption of crypto mining will help to augment the economic feasibility of renewable energy and encourage the expansion of renewable energy production.

For example, America’s Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), a Texan electrical grid operator, has devised a large, flexible load curtailment programme, in which almost all operational large, flexible loads are crypto mining facilities. During the winter storm Elliott in December 2022, the crypto miners’ hashrate drastically declined to 38% of the gross cryptocurrency network hashrate on the same day, providing the grid with perfectly stable service (see Note 5). China can learn from this model and design a regionally differentiated policy based on the energy structure to regulate crypto mining. In the case of the hydroelectricity-rich Sichuan province, crypto mining activities should be permitted during wet season and be restricted or suspended during dry season. As for Inner Mongolia and Xinjiang, which are rich in wind power and solar power respectively, a dynamic electricity pricing mechanism should be implemented in line with the respective wind and daylight intensity.

In terms of policy, electricity pricing should be dynamically adjusted in accordance with grid power supply and demand. Miners should be charged lower prices when there is an abundant supply of renewable energy but higher prices in case of insufficient electricity supply to encourage power conservation. Such a policy framework involves the following four key elements. First, build a regulatory system that distinguishes crypto mining powered by renewable energy from that relying on fossil fuels, providing policy support for the former while imposing tight restrictions on the latter. Second, implement a dynamic electricity pricing mechanism; adjust pricing according to renewable energy supply and grid load; ensure priority for mining activities to consume excess renewable power; and require mining companies to install smart electricity meters and energy monitoring systems, reporting real-time energy usage data and ensuring regulatory transparency. Third, establish a carbon emissions responsibility mechanism, mandating mining companies to reach specific carbon intensity targets or purchase carbon quotas to offset their emissions. Fourth, consider incorporating crypto mining as part of the local energy transformation pilot schemes to evaluate its actual impact on promoting renewable energy adoption and minimizing carbon emissions.

If crypto mining is to be reinstated in the Mainland, priority could be given to the following three pilot regions.

Sichuan: Given the enormous hydroelectric power resources and low electricity prices in the province, crypto mining using hydroelectricity can be allowed during the wet season to utilize excess hydroelectricity.

Inner Mongolia: With the Autonomous Region’s wind-energy resources in abundance and wind energy in oversupply, a crypto mining industrial park designed for wind-energy utilization could be zoned to balance the volatility of wind energy by leveraging the flexibility of crypto mining.

Xinjiang:  Due to the Autonomous Region’s ample solar-energy resources and isolation from electricity load centres, crypto mining can serve not only as a means of utilizing surplus solar power but also as a new approach to linking crypto mining with industrial poverty alleviation.

Clear carbon emissions monitoring and evaluation systems should be in place in these pilot areas to ensure that crypto mining is instrumental in cutting carbon emissions instead of exacerbating environmental burdens.

A win-win delivering economic and social benefits

Apart from environmental benefits, resuming crypto mining can also bring economic and social value, e.g. opening up industrial growth avenues in less-developed western regions to create employment opportunities and generate local tax revenue. In addition, the electricity expenditures of crypto mining can provide a stable income source for renewable energy investments, thereby facilitating the growth of local clean-energy industries.

While the relationship between crypto mining and carbon emissions is more complex than it appears, a proper regulatory framework and pricing mechanism can support the adoption of renewable energy and help control of emissions. This necessitates that stakeholders move beyond black-and-white thinking and collaborate to strike a balance between technological innovation and environmental protection.

As a front-runner in the advancement of renewable energy and a major contributor to carbon abatement, China is well-positioned to explore the symbiotic development model for crypto mining and renewable energy, offering Chinese ideas and solutions for global energy transformation and climate change. Equating power consumption to carbon emission is a simplistic way of thinking. To limit carbon emissions in future, we need more innovative and complex solutions. With appropriate regulation, crypto mining can become a viable option worth reconsideration by China.

Note 1: https://www.coingecko.com/zh/global-charts

Note 2: https://www.gate.io/zh/learn/articles/60-bitcoin-mining-and-energy-consumption-statistics-for-2023-you-need-to-know/1265

Note 3: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202109/t20210924_1297474.html?code=&state=123

Note 4: https://zjic.zj.gov.cn/ywdh/nyhj/202408/t20240812_22695794.shtml

Note 5: https://ceepr-mit-edu.eproxy.lib.hku.hk/climate-impacts-of-bitcoin-mining-in-the-u-s/

Translation
截至2025年初,全球加密貨幣市場總值已超過3萬億美元【註1】。加密貨幣已從早期只受小眾追捧的專屬領域躍升為世界性金融生態系統。有別於傳統金融市場,加密幣市場全天候運作,沒有疆界限制;目前數百家上市公司、對沖基金、家族辦公室和養老基金均已配置加密資產。去年7月,美國提出《比特幣法案》(BITCOIN Act),以建立比特幣戰略儲備,足見加密貨幣躋身具有戰略意義的資產類別。

與此同時,加密貨幣挖礦業亦是全球性產業,價值高達數十億美元。在美國納斯達克上市的挖礦公司至少有13家,形成了一個專業化、規模化的新興產業鏈。從專業礦機製造,到大規模礦場運營,以至電力交易和碳信用管理,挖礦產業已經超越了簡單的計算活動,成為連接能源、科技與金融的複合型產業。隨着技術進步和監管環境逐步明晰,加密貨幣市場有望繼續擴大在環球金融體系中的影響力,日後可望在國際貨幣體系中扮演更重要角色。

 
挖礦核心地位轉移

然而,媒體經常報道加密貨幣挖礦的電力消耗相當於一個中等規模國家,令許多人視之為環境保護的敵人,也是北京政府於2021年全面加以禁止的一個主因,指其「能源消耗和碳排放量大,對國民經濟貢獻度低,對產業發展、科技進步等帶動作用有限,其盲目無序發展對推動經濟社會高品質發展和節能減排帶來不利影響。」最新研究則顯示,在設計合理的電力價格政策下,加密貨幣挖礦或能有效推動可再生能源發展和降低總體碳排放。

在2021年之前,中國曾是世界最大加密貨幣挖礦中心,佔全球挖礦算力超過65%【註2】,但同年5月,國家發展和改革委員會等部門公布,全面清理和禁止加密貨幣挖礦活動【註3】。這一決定背後的考慮為能源消耗對「能耗雙控」目標的壓力、金融風險管控需要,以及對碳排放的擔憂;挖礦活動隨即移至美國、哈薩克等地。2025年初,美國已成為全球最大的加密貨幣挖礦市場,而中國的正規挖礦活動幾乎完全消失。

 
挖礦與再生能源共創雙贏

加密貨幣挖礦有助碳減排,在於挖礦活動結合可再生能源的3個關鍵特點:初始建設的固定成本高、發電的邊際成本低、發電量與用電需求存在不完美相關性。這些特點窒礙其市場潛力,若電網缺乏足夠靈活性更尤其如此。另一方面,耗電量極大的加密幣挖礦活動則因具備「無記憶性」(即可以在極短時間內關閉並稍後重啟,而不會影響持續的挖礦操作),足以成為可再生能源電網的理想「調節器」,以彌補再生能源供求失衡的弊病。內地正在快速推進可再生能源建設,可受惠於這一機制。

「十四五」規劃明確了風電、太陽能等清潔能源裝機大幅增加的目標,可再生能源的發展卻正面臨「棄風棄光棄水」的挑戰。儘管2024年中國可再生能源裝機容量領先全球,但棄光率仍在某些地區高達10%以上,棄風率在某些省份達到15%【註4】,可見清潔能源浪費嚴重,甚至出現負電價。將挖礦作為可控負載納入電網調節體系,既可消納過剩電力,又能平抑可再生能源的波動性,穩定電網運行,同時創造經濟效益。

在適當的電價政策下,引入加密貨幣挖礦不單可增加可再生能源產能投資,也能在合適條件下,降低總排放。對中國西部能源富餘地區而言,可通過引入加密貨幣挖礦,擴大可再生能源的經濟可行性,進而鼓勵更多可再生能源產能建設。

 
新政策框架與試點地區

舉例來說,美國德克薩斯州電網運營商ERCOT制定了大型靈活負載限電計劃,其中幾乎所有運行中的大型靈活負載都是加密貨幣挖礦設施。2022年12月的冬季風暴Elliott期間,加密貨幣礦工大幅減少算力,相當於當天加密貨幣網路總算力的38%,為電網提供了寶貴的穩定服務【註5】。中國可以借鑑這一模式,針對不同地區的能源結構特點,設計差異化的加密貨幣挖礦監管政策。若在水電豐富的四川,允許加密貨幣挖礦在豐水期運行,而在枯水期則規定減少或暫停活動;至於風電和太陽能豐富的內蒙古和新疆,則可設計分別因應風力和日照強度的動態電價機制。

政策方面,應按電網供需情況而動態調整電價。可再生能源供應充足時,向礦工徵收較低電費;供應不足時則電費較高,以鼓勵節約用電。這種政策框架牽涉4個關鍵要素。一、建立加密貨幣挖礦產業分類監管制度,區分使用可再生能源和化石能源的挖礦活動,對前者給予政策支援,對後者加以嚴格限制。二、實施動態電價機制,根據可再生能源供應情況和電網負荷而調整電價,確保挖礦活動優先使用多餘的可再生能源,並要求挖礦企業安裝智能電錶和能源監測系統,實時上報能源使用數據,確保監管透明度。三、建立碳排放責任機制,規定挖礦企業達到特定的碳強度目標,或購買碳配額抵消其排放。四、考慮將加密貨幣挖礦納入地方能源轉型試點,評估其促進利用可再生能源和降低碳排放的實際效果。

若內地重啟加密貨幣挖礦,可優先考慮在下列3個地區開展試點。

四川:水電資源豐富,電力價格低廉;可在豐水期允許使用水電的挖礦活動,促進消納多餘水電。

內蒙古:風電資源豐富,但棄風問題嚴重;可設立專門的風電消納挖礦產業園,利用加密貨幣挖礦的靈活性來平衡風電的波動性。

新疆:太陽能資源充足,但遠離用電負荷中心;可將加密貨幣挖礦作為消納太陽能電力的方式,同時探索建立與產業扶貧結合的新模式。

這些試點應有明確的碳排放監測和評估機制,確保加密貨幣挖礦確實有助於降低碳排放,而非增加環境負擔。
 

經濟與社會效益雙收

除了環境效益,重啟加密貨幣挖礦還可增添經濟和社會價值, 例如為西部欠發達地區開闢產業增長點,創造就業機會,增加地方稅收。 此外,挖礦企業的電費支出可以為可再生能源投資提供穩定的收入來源,促進當地清潔能源產業發展。

加密貨幣挖礦與碳減排的關係雖比表面看來複雜得多,但適當的監管框架和價格機制足以支援可再生能源的採用和減排。這有賴持份者超越簡單的二元思維,攜手在技術創新與環境保護之間取得平衡。

中國作為全球可再生能源發展的引領者和碳減排的重要貢獻者,有條件探索加密貨幣挖礦與可再生能源的共生發展模式,為全球能源轉型和氣候變化應對提供中國智慧與中國方案。將電力消耗直接等同於碳排放的思維未免過於簡化,在尋求碳減排的前路,我們需要更具創新性和複雜性的解決方案,而受到適當監管的加密貨幣挖礦,相信是值得中國重新考慮的一種選擇。

 

註1: https://www.coingecko.com/zh/global-charts

註2: https://www.gate.io/zh/learn/articles/60-bitcoin-mining-and-energy-consumption-statistics-for-2023-you-need-to-know/1265

註3: https://www.ndrc.gov.cn/xxgk/zcfb/tz/202109/t20210924_1297474.html?code=&state=123

註4: https://zjic.zj.gov.cn/ywdh/nyhj/202408/t20240812_22695794.shtml

註5: https://ceepr.mit.edu/climate-impacts-of-bitcoin-mining-in-the-u-s/

 

何國俊教授
經濟學、管理與商業策略教授
香港大學賽馬會環球企業可持續發展研究所所長

(本文同時於二零二五年三月二十六日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)