Analyzing the performance of RCEP since its inception

After seven years of negotiations, the world’s largest free trade agreement—the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)—officially took effect on January 1, 2022. Member countries account for nearly 30% of the world’s population and over one-third of global GDP. Amid the ongoing fragmentation of the global economy, RCEP is viewed with high expectations. This agreement brings…


Professor Heiwai Tang and Ms Yang Chen

30 April 2025

After seven years of negotiation, the world’s largest free-trade agreement―the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)—officially took effect on 1 January 2022, covering close to 30% of the world’s population and accounting for over one-third of the global GDP. Amid intensifying global economic fragmentation, the RCEP carries high expectations. By encompassing both large and small Asia-Pacific countries with different systems, the agreement demonstrates great potential and resilience for inclusive regional cooperation.

What impacts has the RCEP had on the Asia-Pacific trade landscape since its implementation three years ago? How will it reshape the patterns of trade among its members? Based on the RCEP Trade Tracker developed by HKU Asia Global Institute (see Note), this article provides a comparative analysis of trade performance among RCEP economies between the first quarter of 2020 and the third quarter of 2024. The findings demonstrate the following four prevailing trends shaping trade dynamics under the agreement.

  1. China remains the dominant exporter within the region, but its trade growth has clearly slowed down. While its exports to RCEP partners experienced a modest recovery in 2024 after a decline the previous year, the overall momentum has weakened.
  2. In pursuit of a deliberate trade diversification strategy, Japan has strengthened ties with Vietnam, Malaysia, etc. while effectively reducing reliance on China. Its overall trade within the RCEP framework saw a marginal contraction in 2024.
  3. After a downturn in 2023, intra-ASEAN trade recorded a strong rebound by 7% in 2024, reflecting deepening regional economic integration and providing member nations with a fresh growth impetus.
  4. RCEP economies are increasingly trading with non-member countries. In 2024, this trade expanded by 5% to reach US$3.4 trillion, surpassing intra-RCEP trade growth for the first time.

Trend 1: Mild growth of China’s trade with RCEP  

As a core RCEP member, China has been playing a prominent role in regional trade. In the first three quarters of 2024, its exports to RCEP nations totalled US$2.76 billion. The 3.6% year-on-year increase marks a cautious recovery following an 8.5% downturn in 2023. This modest rebound suggests that China’s trade within the region has entered a phase of steady growth.

In the wake of the coronavirus pandemic, China’s exports to the RCEP bloc surged by an impressive 24.9% in 2021, followed by continued strong growth in 2022. However, Chinese exports to the RCEP bloc contracted for the first time by 8.5% in 2023, as a result of global supply chain restructuring and intense competition from ASEAN manufacturing industries.

The uptick in 2024 was accompanied by a significant change in market structure. On the one hand, China’s exports to Japan have fallen for two consecutive years (by 1.9% in 2024 and 5.1% in 2023), indicating that Japan is actively diversifying its supply chains and gradually reducing dependency on China. On the other hand, the performance of the Vietnamese market stood out. China’s exports to this market rose by 12.7%, reversing the 7.5% decline in 2023. This demonstrates Vietnam’s escalating status in the global supply chains.

Within the ASEAN region, China’s trade performance varied. Laos, Cambodia, and Vietnam recorded the fastest annual growth of 17.7%, 14.6%, and 12.7% respectively for Chinese exports. This underscores the rising economic vibrancy of the Indo-Chinese countries. In comparison, the relatively mature markets such as Singapore and Thailand maintained stable growth at around 6%, while Indonesia registered a slight growth of 0.3%. China’s exports to Australia and Myanmar shrank by 7.5% and 17.6% respectively, due to weaker demand triggered by domestic factors in both countries.

Particularly noteworthy is that China’s exports to South Korea showed a remarkable recovery in 2024, incrementing by 9.6%, mainly thanks to renewed demand for electronic components and industrial equipment. This change not only hinges on a resurgence of manufacturing in South Korea, but also testifies to the positive effect of RCEP tariff concessions on high-tech supply chains.

On the whole, while China remains the largest trade hub within the RCEP, intra-bloc trade flows have diversified. This shift is simultaneously driven by members’ industrial upgrading and supply chain adjustments, as well as the deepening progress in regional economic integration under the RCEP agreement.

Trade ties between China and RCEP partners have entered a new phase. On the one hand, with its comprehensive industrial system and scale advantages, China will continue to serve as the key supplier of mechanical equipment and electronic products. On the other hand, by upgrading their manufacturing capabilities and signing diversified trade agreements, the ASEAN countries gradually reduce overdependence on a single market. Such a state of dynamic equilibrium is expected to continue reshaping the future trade map of the RCEP region.

Trend 2: Gradual stabilization of Japan’s trade with RCEP after pandemic volatility

From 2020 onwards, Japan’s trade relations with RCEP countries have been characterized by fluctuating patterns of both substantial ups and downs. Despite a remarkable 23.2% growth in its exports to RCEP nations in 2021, the momentum soon faded. Japan’s total exports to the region plunged by 13.3% in 2023 and further dropped by 3.5% in 2024, reflecting a persistent cooling of regional demand.

One of the most striking shifts is Japan’s evolving relationship with ASEAN markets. The Vietnamese and Malaysian markets are fairly resilient, with Japan’s exports to these two markets expanding steadily, in contrast to the sharp declines of 11.8% and 12.9% to Thailand and Indonesia respectively. Japan’s trade with the Philippines, after a staggering 19.1% contraction in 2023, experienced a diminished decline to 2.6% in 2024, showing initial signs of stabilization.

These diversification trends align with Japan’s strategic adjustments to its supply chains, prioritizing Vietnam and Malaysia as important bases because of their prosperous manufacturing sectors, lower production costs, and active participation in strategic trade pacts, such as the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) and the RCEP, in support of Japan’s China+1 strategy for supply chain diversification. In contrast, owing to higher production costs, political uncertainties, and slower economic recovery, Thailand and Indonesia are notably less competitive among Japanese export markets.

Clearly evident is Japan’s progressive disengagement from the Chinese market. In 2020, China was Japan’s primary trading partner within the region, representing 48% of Japan’s total RCEP-bound exports. This percentage slipped to 41.7% in 2023 but slightly rebounded to 42.8% in 2024, illustrating China’s indispensable role and the structural constraints Japan faces in its endeavours to redirect trade dynamics.

Trend 3: Intra-ASEAN trade growth outpacing RCEP bloc

Intra-ASEAN trade showed strong growth in 2021 and 2022, followed by an unforeseen contraction of 13.3% in 2023 but a modest recovery of 7.03% in 2024. These volatilities suggest that, in addition to facing external impacts including a slowdown in global trade and supply chain disruptions, some ASEAN economies were also subject to the structural problem of weak domestic demand.

Nevertheless, intra-ASEAN trade performed better than intra-RCEP trade. In 2022, intra-ASEAN trade growth even doubled that of the RCEP economies (see Figure), highlighting deepening regional economic integration within the ASEAN. Despite experiencing a downturn similar to intra-RCEP trade in 2023, intra-ASEAN trade recorded a pronounced rebound of 7.03% in 2024, demonstrating the ASEAN’s strengthening resistance to external impacts.

Trade performance varied across ASEAN members. Vietnam’s exports to the ASEAN region leapt by 23.6% and 26.2% in 2021 and 2022 respectively, resulting in an accumulated rise of over 50%. This achievement secured the country’s position as a key node in ASEAN’s supply chains. Despite a fall of 7.63% in 2023, Vietnam’s exports to other ASEAN nations rebounded with 3.92% growth in 2024, suggesting its trade network’s gradual adaptation to the new normal.

As for Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore, their trade performance was highly volatile. After surging by 21.2% and 39.6% in 2021 and 2022 respectively, trade among these countries saw a sharp decline of 18.6% in 2023, followed by an additional 8% drop in 2024. The downturn for two consecutive years implies that this trilateral trade may be facing structural challenges. In contrast, Thailand demonstrated stronger adaptability. After peaking at US$54.8 billion in 2022, Thailand’s intra-ASEAN exports declined by 10.3% in 2023 but rebounded with a 5.5% growth in 2024. This illustrates a recovery in demand for Thai exports, driven by a resurgence in investment and production activities within ASEAN.

Trend 4: RCEP deepening trade ties with non-members

Trade between RCEP members and non-member nations has exhibited a dynamic trajectory, reaching a total trade value of US$3.37 trillion in the first three quarters of 2024, representing a 5% increase over 2023. The most unprecedented expansion occurred in 2021, when trade shot up by nearly 30% (spurred by post-pandemic recovery and robust demand worldwide). Despite a temporary contraction of 7% from global economic downturn pressures in 2023, a rapid rebound in 2024 underscores the adaptability and resilience of the RCEP economies as they continued to strengthen their global trade networks.

South Korea has been a leading force in this expansion, with its exports to non-RCEP partners climbing to US$289 billion in 2024, marking a year-on-year growth of 12.8%. An extraordinary 30.62% jump in its exports to non-RCEP partners in 2021 signalled South Korea’s vitality and resilience, derived from its deep integration into the international market.

Indonesia’s journey, however, has been more turbulent. After skyrocketing by 33.68% and 35.1% in 2021 and 2022 respectively, its exports plummeted by 16.01% in 2023, reflecting multiple challenges, including weaker global demand, supply chain disruptions, and shifts in trade policies. While 2024 saw a minor increase of 3.14% in exports, the country’s pace of recovery clearly lagged behind that of other major economies in the region.

Overall, while intra-RCEP trade remains a vital driver of economic integration, member nations are actively diversifying their partnerships beyond the bloc, generating a vigorous export-oriented momentum. The RCEP is gradually transitioning from a regional economic growth engine to a pivotal force in reshaping the global trade landscape.

Note: https://www.asiaglobalinstitute.hku.hk/rcep-trade-tracker

Translation
歷經7年談判,全球規模最大的自由貿易協定——《區域全面經濟夥伴關係協定》(RCEP)於2022年1月1日正式生效,成員國共佔世界人口近30%以及全球GDP超過三分之一。在全球經濟碎片化持續加劇之際,RCEP被寄予厚望。這項協定匯聚了亞太地區規模懸殊、制度各異的多元國家,展現出區域包容性合作的強大潛力與韌性。

實施至今3年以來,RCEP對亞太地區的貿易格局產生了哪些影響?又將如何重塑成員國之間的貿易模式?本文將根據香港大學亞洲環球研究所團隊建立的「RCEP Tracker」【註】,比較分析2020年首季至2024年第三季各RCEP成員的貿易表現,並總結出以下四大發展主軸:

一、中國穩居RCEP區內最大出口國之位,但出口增長明顯放緩。雖然2024年對RCEP夥伴的出口在2023年衰退後稍有回升,然而整體動能仍顯疲弱。

二、日本持續推進貿易多元化策略,在加強與越南、馬來西亞等國合作的同時,有效降低對中國市場的依賴。綜觀2024年,日本對RCEP的整體貿易額略有下降。

三、東盟內部貿易在經歷2023年的萎縮後,於2024年強勁反彈7%,反映出區域經濟整合逐漸深化,為成員國帶來新的增長動力。

四、RCEP成員與非成員國之間的貿易持續擴大。2024年,對非RCEP夥伴的出口增長達5%,總額為3.4萬億美元,增幅首次超過區內貿易。

 

趨勢一:中國對RCEP貿易增長放緩

中國作為RCEP的核心成員,一直在區域貿易中扮演主導角色。2024年首三季,中國對RCEP成員國的出口總額達27.6億美元,按年同期增長3.6%,在2023年8.5%衰退之後,貿易活動呈現穩步回升的趨勢。這一溫和復甦反映出中國與RCEP夥伴國的貿易關係已經調整,進入平穩階段。

新冠肺炎疫情後,中國對RCEP的出口於2021年錄得24.9%的爆發式增長,並在2022年延續強勁擴張。然而,隨着全球供應鏈重組、東盟國家製造業競爭力提升,2023年中國對RCEP的出口首次出現8.5%的負增長。

2024年的小幅回升,伴隨着明顯的市場結構變化。一方面,中國對日本的出口已連續第二年下滑(2024年下降1.9%,2023年下降5.1%),反映日本積極推動供應鏈多元化,逐步減少對中國的依賴。另一方面,越南市場表現出色。中國對越南出口增長12.7%,一舉扭轉2023年7.5%的跌勢,凸顯越南在全球供應鏈中的地位持續上升。

在東盟區內,中國的貿易表現各異。老撾、柬埔寨及越南分別以17.7%、14.6%及12.7%的年增長率,成為中國出口增速最快的市場,可見中南半島國家經濟活力顯著提升。相比之下,新加坡、泰國等較成熟市場則維持約6%的穩定增長,印尼則僅微升0.3%。澳洲與緬甸因國內因素而出現需求萎縮,中國對這兩國的出口分別減少7.5%和17.6%。

值得注意的是,中國對南韓的出口於2024年強勁反彈9.6%,主要受惠於電子零組件及工業設備需求回升。這一變化與南韓製造業景氣回暖密切相關,亦印證了RCEP關稅優惠對高科技產業供應鏈的積極促進作用。

整體而言,儘管中國仍然是RCEP區域最大的貿易樞紐,但成員國彼此的貿易流向已趨多元化。這一變化既源於各國產業升級與供應鏈調整,也反映出RCEP框架下區域經濟整合的深化進程。

中國與RCEP夥伴國的貿易關係已踏上新台階。一方面,中國憑藉完備的產業體系與規模優勢,將繼續在機械設備與電子產品領域擔當關鍵供應者角色;另一方面,東盟國家則透過提升製造能力及簽署多元化貿易協定,逐步打破對單一市場的過度依賴。這種動態平衡的格局,預料將持續重塑RCEP區域未來的貿易版圖。



 

趨勢二:日本對RCEP貿易疫後波動漸緩

自2020年以來,日本與RCEP成員國的貿易關係呈現明顯的起伏波動。2021年,日本對RCEP國家的出口一度錄得23.2%的強勁增長,只是勢頭未能延續。2023年,出口總額更急跌13.3%,2024年進一步下降3.5%,反映區內需求持續降溫。

貿易格局的轉變,亦清晰地體現於日本與東盟市場關係的重構表徵。越南與馬來西亞市場韌性較強,日本對這兩國的出口維持穩定增長;反觀對泰國及印尼則分別大幅下滑11.8%和12.9%。菲律賓市場在經歷2023年19.1%的重挫後,2024年跌幅收窄至2.6%,呈現初步企穩的跡象。

這種多樣化趨勢,反映出日本供應鏈策略的調整方向。越南與馬來西亞得力於製造業發展蓬勃、生產成本較低,以及積極參與《全面與進步跨太平洋夥伴關係協定》(CPTPP)與RCEP等戰略性貿易協定,正逐步成為日本推動「中國+1」供應鏈多元化的重要據點。相較之下,泰國與印尼因生產成本上漲、政治局勢不明朗,以及經濟復甦緩慢等因素,在日本出口市場中的競爭力尤其遜色。

顯而易見,日本正致力降低對中國市場的依賴。2020年,中國佔日本對RCEP成員國出口總額的48%,為其區內最重要的貿易夥伴。至2023年,該比例降至41.7%,但在2024年則又稍升至42.8%。這種波動既反映出中國市場難以被完全取代的現實,亦顯露出日本在重塑貿易格局過程中所面臨的結構性制約。

 

趨勢三:東盟貿易增速超越RCEP整體

東盟區內貿易在2021和2022年維持攀升,2023年卻一度意外收縮13.3%,但隨即在2024年錄得7.03%的溫和復甦。此一起伏走勢反映出在面臨全球貿易放緩、供應鏈中斷等外部衝擊之際,部分東盟經濟體亦受制於內部需求疲弱的結構性問題。

縱使如此,東盟區內貿易的表現始終優於RCEP整體水平。2022年,東盟區內貿易的增幅甚至達RCEP區內貿易的兩倍【圖】,充分彰顯東盟區域經濟一體化的深化趨勢。即便東盟貿易在2023年與RCEP貿易同步下滑,但隨即在2024年實現7.03%的較強反彈,足證該區域抵禦外部衝擊的能力不斷提高。

東盟各成員國的表現亦存在明顯差異。越南在2021和2022年對東盟出口分別增長23.6%和26.2%,累計增幅逾50%,鞏固了其作為區域供應鏈關鍵節點的地位。出口雖在2023年下降7.63%,但在2024年則錄得3.92%的增長,貿易網絡正逐步適應新常態。

至於印尼、馬來西亞、新加坡的貿易表現,則尤見波動。出口額繼2021年21.2%與2022年39.6%的爆發式躍升後,在2023年卻驟降18.6%,2024年更進一步下滑8.0%。連續兩年的萎縮,或意味著三國間的貿易合作正面臨結構性挑戰。相比之下,泰國展現出較強的適應能力,繼在2022年創下548億美元的出口高峰,並於2023年下跌10.3%之後,又已在2024年回升5.5%,反映隨着區域投資與生產活動回暖,市場對泰國產品的需求亦漸恢復。



 

趨勢四:RCEP與非成員國貿易關係日趨深化

RCEP成員與非成員國之間的貿易往來持續展現蓬勃活力,2024年首三季的貿易總額高達3.37萬億美元,較2023年增長5%。這股強勢延續了2021年近30%的爆發式增長(當時受惠於疫後經濟復甦及全球需求激增),即便2023年在全球經濟下行壓力下曾短暫回落7%,但在2024年迅速反彈,仍充分彰顯RCEP經濟體的適應力及其全球貿易網絡的韌性。

南韓表現尤為亮眼,在2024年對非RCEP夥伴的出口額達2,890億美元,同比增長12.8%。自2021年錄得30.62%的驚人增幅以來,該國再次展現出其在全球市場深度整合的實力與韌性。

印尼的發展軌跡則較為波動,在2021和2022年,其出口分別飆升33.68%與35.1%,但至2023年則急劇逆轉,出口大跌16.01%,反映出全球需求放緩、供應鏈中斷及貿易政策調整等多重挑戰。儘管在2024年收復失地,出口微升3.14%,但復甦步伐明顯遜於區內其他主要經濟體。

整體而言,RCEP成員國在加速推進區域經濟整合的同時,亦積極拓展全球貿易網絡,發揮強大的外向型動能。RCEP正逐步從區域經濟增長引擎,邁向重塑全球貿易版圖的關鍵力量。

 

註: https://www.asiaglobalinstitute.hku.hk/rcep-trade-tracker

 

鄧希煒教授
港大經管學院副院長(對外事務)、馮國經馮國綸基金經濟學教授、亞洲環球研究所所長

陳陽女士
亞洲環球研究所研究員

(本文同時於二零二五年四月三十日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)