Regulations and Taxation of A-share Market Cash Dividends

As distributing cash dividends has been a growing trend in A-share market, related regulations and taxation have also become issues of concern for investors. In recent years, the China Securities Regulatory Commission has implemented a series of measures to enhance the regulation of distributing cash dividends by listed companies, and encourage the increase of dividend…


Further to our discussion in this column last week regarding cash dividend distribution among A-Share listed companies and the growing trend in recent years, below is a review of the background factors and related taxation issues.

Legislating to keep up with the times

In view of the general apathy among A-share companies towards distributing cash dividends in general, the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has, over the years, introduced various regulations to guide, encourage, and require listed companies to pay dividends. The “Measures for the Administration of the Listed Company Issuing New Shares” were promulgated in 2001 to mandate companies issuing new shares to provide an explanation if they have not declared dividends within the past three years. Released in 2004, the “Provisions on Strengthening the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the General Public Shareholders” specifically prohibit listed companies that failed to distribute profits in cash in the last three years from issuing additional shares and convertible bonds and from allotting shares to the company’s existing shareholders. Aimed at suitably protecting the interests of small and medium investors, this marks the CSRC’s first mandatory requirement for listed companies to pay dividends.

Announced in 2006, the “Administrative Measures for the Issuance of Securities by Listed Companies” stipulate for the first time that the profits accumulatively distributed in cash or stocks should not be less than 20% of the average annual distributable profits realized within the last three years. The “Decision on the Revision of Several Regulations Regarding Cash Dividends” promulgated in 2008 makes cash dividend distribution mandatory and raises the percentage to 30%.

Measures for cash dividends released by the CSRC in 2012, 2013, 2015, and 2022 underline the prescriptive nature of dividend distribution and are thus conducive to promoting this practice. Promulgated in 2013, the “Guideline No. 3 on the Supervision and Administration of Listed Companies ― Cash Dividend Distribution of Listed Companies” (hereinafter “Cash-Dividend Distribution Guideline”) makes it mandatory, for the first time, for independent board members to put forward their independent views on cash dividends. Besides, securities regulators are required to pay special attention to any irregularities about a company’s cash dividend distribution, e.g. withholding such distribution in spite of readily available funds or substantial dividends, or cash dividend payouts excluded in the company’s Articles of Association. The Guideline enables the board of a listed company to implement a differentiated cash-dividend-distribution policy based on comprehensive considerations of such factors as the company’s industry characteristics, development stage, its business model, profitability, and any arrangements for major capital expenditure.

.If the company is at a mature stage of development and has no arrangements for major capital expenditure – the proportion of cash dividends (i.e. cash dividends divided by the sum of cash dividends and stock dividends) should account for at least 80% of the profits distributed in the corresponding period;

.If the company is at a mature stage of development but has arrangements for major capital expenditure – the proportion of cash dividends should account for at least 40% of the profits distributed in the corresponding period;

.If the company is at a growing stage of development and has arrangements for major capital expenditure, the proportion of cash dividends should account for at least 20% of the profits distributed in the corresponding period;

.If it is difficult to identify the company’s development stage and the company has arrangements for major capital expenditure, then the provisions in the foregoing paragraph shall apply.

The “Notice on Encouraging Mergers, Acquisitions, and Restructuring, Cash Dividends, and Share Repurchase of Listed Companies” rolled out in 2015 encourages, for the first time, listed companies to distribute interim dividends. The 2002 Cash Dividend Distribution Guideline requires the issuer and sponsoring organization to give a reasonable explanation if the cash dividends paid by their listed company are low.

The latest Cash-Dividend Distribution Guideline revised in 2023 mandates that companies prioritize cash payouts as a form of profit distribution and incorporate a cash-dividend distribution policy into their Articles of Association. The proportion of cash dividends in the distributed profits for the corresponding period, as specified in the 2013 Cash-Dividend Distribution Guideline, still applies. In accordance with the Guideline, listed companies are required to disclose the reasons behind their failure to pay dividends. Apart from providing specific reasons for low cash dividends, companies must also disclose their improvement measures to be taken to boost investor returns. This approach aims to urge companies with high capital investment but low dividend payouts to lift their cash dividends. The Guideline also stipulates that, when reviewing the annual profit distribution plan at their annual shareholders’ meetings, listed companies can deliberate and approve the conditions, maximum ratios, maximum amounts, etc. for cash dividends in the following interim period. This facilitates the establishment of the practice of distributing interim dividends and increases the frequency of cash payouts. In addition, the Guideline no longer requires independent board members to provide their individual views, thereby streamlining the company’s internal process of cash-dividend distribution.

Issued in April 2024, the “Guideline in Promoting the High-quality Development of the Capital Markets, Strengthening Regulation, and Forestalling Risks” demands tightening the regulation of cash dividends on the part of listed companies. It requires limiting major shareholders’ reduction of share capital and issuing special-treatment risk alerts for companies that have not distributed dividends or have maintained low dividend ratios for an extended period. The regulation of cash dividend distribution is thus escalated once again.

All in all, the CSRC has been paying increasing attention to and strengthening the regulation of cash dividend distribution of A-Share companies. Such a degree of attention and requirement is rare among regulators worldwide, testifying to the regulator’s effort and determination to protect the interests of public shareholders. As of May 2024, the number of retail investors in the A-Share market stood at 220 million (see 【Note】). It helps to prevent listed companies from using listing as a means of profiteering. Cash-dividend policy has become a matter calling for serious attention for most listed companies.

 

Different dividend tax rates for different markets


It is noteworthy that different rates of profit tax apply to different investors in the A-Share market and the Hong Kong stock market and to dividends derived from different investment methods. For retail investors holding accounts at the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges, the tax rate on cash dividends is determined by the length of shareholding, e.g. at a rate of 20% for shareholdings less than one month long and at a rate of 10% for shareholdings between one month and less than a year. Those with shareholdings exceeding one year are exempted from tax on the dividends received.

Investors who invest in stocks (H shares and non-H shares) listed in Hong Kong via the Southbound Stock Connect are subject to a 20% income tax on cash dividends received. Investors with a Hong Kong Stock Exchange account are subject to a 10% income tax for dividends earned from A-Share stocks via the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect or the Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect. Currently, the treatment of dividend income varies among A-Share and Hong Kong market investors. Mainland investors face a higher dividend income tax when investing in H shares via the Southbound Stock Connect. The advantage of a higher pre-tax dividend yield due to the lower valuation of H shares issued by Mainland companies in the Hong Kong stock market is thus substantially offset. This scenario is not conducive to northbound inflows of funds to the Hong Kong stock market.

Different investors and the same investor using various methods to invest in a company’s stock are subject to different dividend tax rates. This not only influences the investors’ evaluation of dividend yields but may also affect the cash-dividend distribution policies of companies that are simultaneously listed on the A-Share market and the Hong Kong stock market.

Proposed improvements to taxation policy

Based on the above taxation analysis, we believe that it behoves regulators to adjust related tax policies in order to minimize or eliminate tax inequality, i.e. different tax rates levied on local and cross-border investors due to different investment account locations and different investment methods.

As it stands, protecting investors’ interests by guiding listed companies to distribute cash dividends through the CSRC’s regulatory requirements is doing more good than harm. In the long run, the decision to whether or not distribute cash dividends and to determine dividend payout ratios should be left in the hands of the listed companies, subject to approval by shareholders’ meetings. When the opportunity is ripe, regulators could consider relaxing or scrapping the dividend-distribution requirement for young innovation and technology companies that have research and development (R&D) expenditure reaching a certain proportion and have less cash holdings. This will serve to facilitate effort by promising companies to build up sufficient funds so that their market competitiveness can be maintained through R&D input and capital investment.

 

Note: https://www.news.cn/mrdx/2024-01/25/c_1310761978.htm

 

Professor Hong Zou
Professor of Economics

Mr Zike Shen
Masters Students at HKUBS

(This article was also published on July 3, 2024 in the “Lung Fu Shan” column of the Hong Kong Economic Journal)

Translation
 

繼筆者上周在本欄分析A股上市公司的現金分紅情況與近年的增長趨勢,下文將扼要剖析其中背景,並探討相關的稅務問題。
監管法規與時俱進

鑑於A股上市公司一般進行現金分紅的積極性不高,中國證券監督管理委員會(中國證監會)多年來發布多項規章引導、鼓勵,要求上市公司進行分紅。2001年,《上市公司新股發行管理辦法》指出新發行股票的上市公司須解釋近3年沒有分紅的原因。2004年,《關於加強社會公眾股股東權益保護的若干規定》明確規定上市公司最近3年未進行現金利潤分配者,不得向社會公眾增發新股、發行可轉換公司債券或向原有股東配售股份。這是中國證監會第一次採取強制性規定促使上市公司分紅,目的是切實保障中小投資者的利益。

2006年,《上市公司證券發行管理辦法》首次明確規定企業近3年現金或股票累計分配的利潤應不少於近3年實現的年均可分配利潤的20%。到2008年,《關於修改上市公司現金分紅若干規定的決定》列明須進行現金分紅,並將這一比例提升到30%。

中國證監會在2012年、2013年、2015年、2022年相繼發布了有關現金分紅的措施,強調分紅的規範性,有助於進一步推廣現金分紅。在2013年的《上市公司監管指引第3號──上市公司現金分紅》(下稱「現金分紅指引」)中,首度要求獨立董事就現金分紅出具獨立意見,證券監管機構需重點關注現金分紅的異常情況(如有資金卻不分紅、大額分紅或公司章程並未規定現金分紅)。該指引允許上市公司董事會綜合考慮所處行業特點、發展階段、自身經營模式、盈利水準,以及是否有重大資金支出安排等因素,實施差異化的現金分紅政策:

.發展階段屬成熟期且無重大資金支出安排──進行利潤分配時,現金分紅在本次利潤分配中所佔比例(即現金分紅除以現金分紅和股票股利之和)最低應達到80%;

.發展階段屬成熟期且有重大資金支出安排──現金分紅在本次利潤分配中所佔比例最低應達到40%;

.發展階段屬成長期且有重大資金支出安排──現金分紅在本次利潤分配中所佔比例最低應達到20%;

.發展階段不易區分但有重大資金支出安排──可以按照前項規定處理。

2015年發布的《關於鼓勵上市公司兼併重組、現金分紅及回購股份的通知》中,首次提出鼓勵上市公司實施中期分紅。2022年的現金分紅指引中規定,如公司現金分紅水準較低,發行人及保薦機構應作出合理解釋。

2023年最新修改的現金分紅指引明確規定現金分紅在利潤分配方式中的優先地位,現金分紅的政策須寫入上市公司章程;2013年現金分紅指引中規定的現金分紅在當次利潤分配中所佔比例仍然適用。企業務必按指引披露未分紅原因,除了披露現金分紅低的具體原因以外,還要公開增強投資者回報水準擬採取的改進措施,以此督促財務投資較多但分紅水準偏低的公司提高分紅水準。指引又規定上市公司召開年度股東大會審議年度利潤分配方案時,可審議批准下一年中期現金分紅的條件、比例上限、金額上限等,引導企業形成中期分紅的習慣,提高分紅頻次。另外,該指引不再強制要求獨立董事出具意見,簡化了公司現金分紅的內部流程。

2024年4月發布的《關於加強監管防範風險推動資本市場高品質發展的若干意見》(「國九條」)提出要強化對上市公司現金分紅的監管,對多年未分紅或分紅比例偏低的公司,限制大股東減持、實施特殊處理(special treatment)風險警示。因此,對現金分紅的監管再次升級。

總的來看,中國證監會對A股上市公司現金分紅情況愈發關注、持續加強監管,這種關注和要求在全球的證券監管者中都是罕見的,體現了監管者保護大量個人投資者的利益(截至2024年5月,A股市場有2.2億個人投資者【註】),防止上市公司以上市作為圈錢的手段,可見用心良苦。現金分紅政策成了大多數上市公司必須認真對待的事項。
分紅課稅比率各異

需要指出的是,在徵收現金分紅所得稅時,不同的稅率適用於A股和港股市場的不同投資者以及通過不同投資方式而取得的分紅。對於在內地滬深交易所開設交易賬戶的個人投資者所獲現金分紅,須根據持有股票的時間繳交相應的稅款。若投資者持股期限不超過1個月,須繳20%的稅;持股期限1個月以上至1年,須付10%;持股期限超過1年者,所獲分紅暫時免稅。

投資者通過「港股通」投資在香港上市的股票(H股和非H股)獲得的分紅,須繳20%的所得稅。在香港聯交所開戶的投資者,若透過「滬港通」或「深港通」投資A股股票獲得分紅,須繳交10%所得稅,與投資香港H股獲得分紅的稅率相同。所以,目前對A股和港股市場投資者的分紅徵稅並未做到一視同仁,內地投資者透過「港股通」投資H股的話,須承擔較高的分紅所得稅,這樣一來,原本港股市場因為內地公司發行H股的估值低而獲得的較高稅前股息收益率優勢,將被顯著抵消,以致不利於北向資金流入港股市場。

不同投資者和同一投資者以不同方式投資同一公司的股票而獲派息,因面臨稅務負擔各異,不僅影響投資者對股息收益率的評估,也可能影響部分在A股和港股同時上市的公司的現金分紅政策。
改善稅務政策建議

根據上述的徵稅分析,筆者認為監管部門應該對相關稅收政策進行調整,減少或消除由於境內和境外投資者因開戶地、投資方式不同而產生分紅所得稅的稅務不均等。

在現階段通過中國證監會的監管要求,引導上市公司進行現金分紅,保障投資者的利益,是利大於弊。長期來看,上市公司現金分紅與否及分紅水準的釐定,仍應屬上市公司自主決策範疇,經上市公司股東大會批准即可。在未來合適的時機,監管部門或許可以考慮對於研發費用達到一定比例、年輕又持有現金較少的科創公司予以放寬或豁免現金分紅的要求,以便成長性高的科創公司能夠保留足夠的資金進行研發的投入和資本投資,保持市場競爭力。

註:https://www.news.cn/mrdx/2024-01/25/c_1310761978.htm

 

鄒宏教授
港大經管學院金融學教授

沈子軻先生
港大經管學院碩士生

(本文同時於二零二四年七月三日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)