“Home-First” Policy vs Real-World Charging Needs: Hong Kong as a Global EV Showroom Series

For many electric vehicle (EV) owners in Hong Kong, circling around the car park near home after work to look for an available charging spot has become a daily routine. At weekends, they drive to park at shopping malls, only to find few charging bays available.


Professor Zhixi Wan

10 December 2025

For many electric vehicle (EV) owners in Hong Kong, circling around the car park near home after work to look for an available charging spot has become a daily routine. At weekends, they drive to park at shopping malls, only to find few charging bays available. Under the strong drive of demand-side policies such as the “One-for-One Replacement” Scheme (see Note 1), the number of electric private cars (e-PCs) rose at an unprecedented pace from approximately 14,000 in 2019 to 135,000 in September 2025. The retail penetration rate of new EV sales skyrocketed to a staggering 71.04% (see Note 2). However, in terms of supporting infrastructure, as of mid-2025, the public charger-to EV ratio in Hong Kong was roughly 9:1, far lower than that of about 3:1 in neighbouring Shenzhen across the river (see Note 3). The widening “scissors gap” between the exponential growth in EV numbers and the slow, linear rollout of charging facilities is seriously compromising the charging experience for EV users in Hong Kong.

Figure 1  Changing metrics on EV ownership in Hong Kong (see Note 4)

Indicators2019202120232025 (Q1–Q3)
EV ownership (10,000 units)1.42.87.613.5
EV share of total vehicles (%)1.58%3.03%8.28%14.696%
Penetration rate of newly-registered electric private cars (%)24.38%64.62%71.04%

Top-level design for “home charging”

From the perspectives of economics and energy management, the “home-first” policy (charging facilities near users’ homes) is no doubt the best option. Not only is it the most cost-effective but it can also smooth out peak-valley disparities in grid load and enhance overall energy utilization efficiency. Take the development of home-charging infrastructure in Mainland cities, for example―the application procedure is already quite well established.

However, unlike the late-mover energy infrastructure in the Mainland, Hong Kong’s high-density living environment and abundance of old buildings pose structural and technical hurdles to the installation of charging facilities in existing parking spaces. In addition, any change to public areas in a building is usually subject to approval by the owners’ corporation. Under the Building Management Ordinance, such resolutions often require the consent of at least 50% or an even higher proportion of ownership. The whole process is laborious and fraught with uncertainty.

Figure 2 (see Note 5)

To address the above challenges, the SAR Government launched the EV-charging at Home Subsidy Scheme in 2020, with a funding ceiling of $3.5 billion. The Scheme is intended to provide financial support for installing charging infrastructure in the car parks of private residential buildings. However, there remain gaps in what the Scheme currently covers.

First of all, the core subsidy scope of the scheme primarily covers “basic framework” works in the public areas of a car park. The “final step” from the public junction box to the car owner’s private parking space, including cable installation and charging pile setup, still requires the owner to shoulder the relevant costs and manage the application procedures.

Secondly, the Scheme ceased to accept new applications on 31 December 2023 (see Note 6) and thus could no longer benefit more existing buildings. According to the 2024 Survey on the Charging Habits of Electric Vehicle Users in Hong Kong conducted by the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (see Note 7), 28.1% of respondents said their housing estates did not meet the eligibility criteria for the subsidy. Only 10.1% had successfully applied and completed all subsidized works.

Finally, the above Scheme has failed to remove the legal obstacles arising from deed of mutual covenant restrictions. Many medium- to large-sized private housing estates, especially older ones, may contain provisions in their deeds of mutual covenant that restrict or prohibit the installation of additional power facilities. Such legal constraints cannot be overcome by financial subsidies alone, but would necessitate legislative amendments or policy exemptions to resolve.

Misplaced supplementary positioning of public charging

If the ideal of “home charging” proves elusive in the Hong Kong context, the positioning of public charging as a supplementary option is even more misaligned in view of actual utilization. The above Survey shows that nearly 75% of respondents used public chargers, while merely 14.3% charged their vehicles at their residential estates. The public charger-to-EV ratio deteriorated from 5.5:1 in 2020 to 9:1 in 2025 (see Note 8), with the supply gap continuing to widen. For EV users without access to “home charging”, what they need is not to spend six to 10 hours fully charging their cars with a medium-speed charger, but to rapidly replenish power via DC fast chargers. However, as of mid-2025, of the approximately 14,553 public chargers in Hong Kong, an overwhelming majority—9,482 units, or almost 65%—were medium-speed chargers. In contrast, quick and fast charges together numbered 2,270, accounting for less than 16% of the total public chargers (see Note 9).

Unlike Hong Kong’s “cars waiting for chargers” model, driven by incentives for private EV purchase, Shenzhen has adopted a clear “from public to private; chargers waiting for cars” strategy, starting from the high-frequency operations of public transport. In 2017, Shenzhen became the first megacity in the world to have over 16,000 electric buses. This was followed in 2018 by the complete electrification of approximately 22,000 taxis across the city (see Note 10). Through strong government leadership, a large, stable, and highly predictable market for public charging was deliberately created. This stable “basic load” serves to mitigate the investment risk and uncertainty over future returns for charging facility operators, thereby promoting a sustainable and profitable business model as well as facilitating the construction and operation of a rapid-charging network.

In contrast, the “cars waiting for chargers” model in Hong Kong leaves its public quick-charging network dependent on private EV owners, whose demand is uncertain, with low charging frequency and widely-spaced charging times. This causes significant variability in investment returns, making it difficult for market forces to initiate large-scale, systematic investments in quick-charging facilities. Nevertheless, the market potential in Hong Kong should not be underestimated. The city’s over 18,000 taxis, together with an increasingly sizeable ride-hailing fleet, also represent a substantial fleet of vehicles engaged in high-intensity daily operations.

A pragmatic way ahead for Hong Kong’s charging strategy

The SAR Government recently announced that it would earmark $300 million for the Fast Charger Incentive Scheme, with the goal of adding 3,000 fast chargers (see Note 11). This undoubtedly marks a crucial step towards a sustainable future. Going forward, the Government will increasingly play the roles of a “system designer” and a “market shaper”, guiding the behaviour of market participants and fostering the healthy self-operation of the market. For instance, promoting the electrification of taxis is intended to create predictable demand; planning community charging hubs helps optimize the spatial distribution of supply; and exploring ways to streamline the approval procedures for owners’ corporations, or providing them with standardized guidelines, is aimed at removing institutional barriers.

By shifting the policy from “giving a fish” to “teaching to fish”, the policy outcomes will be more sustainable and effective in utilizing limited public resources to fundamentally resolve the predicament of charging in Hong Kong. This will transform the city into a proactive leader spearheading industry development and a “global showcase” for smart mobility and green energy management solutions.

Note 1: First registration tax concessions for electric vehicles: If the application criteria are met, a registered owner of private cars may consider arranging to scrap and de-register his/her “old private car” and then first registering a “replacement electric private car” under his/her own name within the effective period of the “One-for-One Replacement” Scheme (i.e. 28 February 2018 to 31 March 2026, both dates inclusive) to enjoy a higher first registration tax concession.

Note 2: Table 4.4, Monthly Traffic and Transport Digest, Transport Department, Hong Kong SAR Government

Note 3: Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong SAR Government: Hong Kong Major Public EV Chargers Reference Database; Shenzhen Municipal Development and Reform Commission: As of the end of June 2025, Shenzhen had put into operation 1,057 fast-charging stations and over 487,000 charging piles.

Note 4: Table 4.4, Monthly Traffic and Transport Digest, Transport Department, Hong Kong SAR Government

Note 5: EV-charging at Home Subsidy Scheme step-by-step guide, Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong SAR Government; 深圳市福田區發展與改革局:先可透過「南網線上」APP或小程式進行線上申請充電樁用電報表安裝,需提供身分證明資料、物業產權合法證明資料(車位產權所屬證明或充電樁用電地址物權管理單位出具的安裝同意書),透過申請後供電局將現場裝填。

Note 6: Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong SAR Government: The funding earmarked for the applications received under the EV-charging at Home Subsidy Scheme (EHSS) had reached the $3.5 billion funding ceiling, and the application period for the EHSS was closed on 31 December 2023.

Note 7: Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions (HKFTU): The HKFTU team of legislative councillors and the Hong Kong Electric Vehicle Charging Concern Group call on the SAR Government to enhance EV-charging infrastructure to help Hong Kong achieve carbon neutrality. Survey on the Charging Habits of Electric Vehicle Users in Hong Kong.

Note 8: Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong SAR Government: Hong Kong Major Public EV Chargers Reference Database, June 2025

Note 9: Environmental Protection Department, Hong Kong SAR Government: Hong Kong Major Public EV Chargers Reference Database, June 2025

Note 10: 深圳政府線上深圳特區報/生態環境部宣傳教育中心:《深圳「綠色公車」模式將在189個國家推廣》、《深圳:提供城市公共服務領域機動車電動化的「中國方案」》

Note 11: Environment and Ecology Bureau: The Chief Executive’s 2024 Policy Address announced that the Government would earmark $300 million for the Fast Charger Incentive Scheme, with the target of providing 3,000 fast chargers to support 16,000 more electric vehicles. It is expected that all fast chargers will be put into service gradually from 2026 to the end of 2028.

Translation

香港電動之路:當「家充為主」的理想,撞上了「公充為輔」的現實

對於許多香港電動車主而言,下班後,在住所附近的停車場「兜圈」尋找一個可用的充電位,已是家常便飯;週末驅車前往商場,充電車位寥寥無幾。在「一換一」計畫[1]等需求側政策的強力驅動下,電動私家車保有量從2019年的約1.4萬輛,以前所未有的速度激增至2025年9月的13.5萬輛,新車銷售滲透率更是攀升至驚人的71.04%[2]。然而在配套基建上,截至2025年中,全港公共車樁比已高達約9:1,這一數字遠遜於一河之隔、公共車樁比約為3:1的深圳[3]。車輛的指數級增長與充電設施的線性緩慢建設之間,形成了一道日益擴大的「剪刀差」,正嚴重侵蝕著用戶的充電體驗。

指標2019202120232025 (Q1~Q3)
EV保有量 (萬輛)1.42.87.613.5
EV佔車輛總量比例 (%)1.58%3.03%8.28%14.96%
新登記私家車EV滲透率 (%)24.38%64.62%71.04%

(圖表1-香港地區EV保有量指標變化)[4]

「家充為主」的頂層設計

從經濟學與能源管理的角度來看,「家充為主」的方針無疑是最佳選擇,不僅電費成本最低,更能有效平抑電網的峰谷差,提高整體能源利用效率。因此例如內地城市對於家用充電的建設,申請流程已經相當成熟。

然而不同於內地後發的能源建設,香港高密度的居住環境,以及大量樓齡偏高的舊式樓宇,使得為現有停車位加裝充電設施面臨著結構性技術障礙。並且,任何涉及樓宇公共空間的改動,通常需要獲得業主立案法團的批准。根據《建築物管理條例》,這類決議往往需要超過半數甚至更高比例的業權份數同意,整個過程耗時費力,充滿不確定性。

(圖表2—香港深圳家用充電樁申請流程)[5]

為應對上述挑戰,特區政府於2020年推出了總額35億港元的「EV屋苑充電易資助計劃」,旨在為現有私人住宅停車場的充電基礎設施安裝提供財政支持。但該計劃在當下的解決方案中仍有一些未觸及的角落。

首先,計畫資助的核心範圍主要覆蓋停車場公共區域的「基礎骨架」工程,但從公共接線盒到車主私人車位的「最後一步」線纜鋪設與充電樁安裝,仍需車主自行承擔相關費用和申請程序。

其次,該計劃已於2023年12月31日停止接受新申請[6],無法再惠及更多的存量樓宇。根據香港工會聯合會於2024年進行的《香港電動車用家充電習慣意見調查》(下稱調查)[ii],近三成(28.1%)的受訪者表示其居住的屋苑不符合申請資格,而已成功申請資助並完成全部工程的,僅佔一成(10.1%)。

最後,計劃未能掃除公契約束的法律障礙。許多中大型私人屋苑,特別是一些樓齡較長的屋苑,其公契中可能包含限製或禁止加裝額外電力設施的條款。這類法律層面的約束,並非單純的財政資助所能克服,需要更深的法律修訂或政策豁免才能解決。

「公充為輔」的現實錯位

如果說「家充為主」的理想在香港的現實面前顯得步履維艱,那麼「公充為輔」的定位則更是與市民的真實用車場景發生了嚴重的錯位。 《調查》顯示,近七成半受訪者表示使用公眾充電樁。只有14.3%受訪者表示在居住屋苑充電。香港車樁比從 2020 年的 5.5:1惡化至 2025 年中的 9:1[8],設施的供需缺口仍在持續擴大。 並且對於無法在家充電的用戶而言,他們最需要的並非需要耗費 6 至 10 小時才能充滿一輛車的中速充電樁,而是在短暫間隙就能完成快速補能的直流快充樁。然而截至 2025 年年中,在全港約 14,553 個公共充電樁中,中速充電樁佔據了壓倒性的絕大多數,達到 9,482 個,佔比近 65%。而快速及高速充電樁合計僅有 2,270 個,佔比不到 16%[9]。

與香港由私人購車優惠驅動的「車等樁」模式不同,深圳採取了清晰的「由公到私,樁等車」的策略,從公共交通這一高頻運營領域入手。 2017年,深圳在全球特大城市中率先實現了全市超過1.6萬輛巴士的純電動化;緊接著在2018年,又完成了約2.2萬輛巡遊的士的全面電動化[10]。透過政府的強力主導,人為地為市場創造了一個龐大、穩定且高度可預測的公共快充需求, 這種穩定的「基礎負荷」降低了充電設施運營商的投資風險和對未來收益的不確定性,從而催生了一個可持續的、有利可圖的商業模式,促進了快充網絡的建設和運營。

反觀香港,其「車等樁」的模式,使得公共快充網絡的商業模式建立在需求不確定、使用頻率低且時間分散的私人電動車主之上。這使得投資回報存在巨大變數,市場力量難以自發地進行大規模、系統性的快充設施投資。然而,香港並非沒有潛力。全港超過 1.8 萬輛的士,加上規模日益可觀的網約車隊,同樣是一支每日高強度運營的龐大車隊。

香港充電策略的務實路徑

政府近期宣布投入 3 億港元推出的「高速充電樁鼓勵計劃」,目標是新增 3,000 個高速充電樁[11],這無疑是朝著可持續未來邁出的一大步。未來,政府會更多地扮演「制度設計者」和「市場塑造者」的角色,引導市場參與者行為、讓市場自行良性運轉。例如,推動的士電動化,是在創造可預測的需求;規劃社區充電樞紐,是在優化供給的空間佈局;研究如何簡化業主立案法團的審批流程或為其提供標準化指引,是在掃除制度障礙。

這種從「授人以魚」到「授人以漁」的角色轉變,其政策效果將更具可持續性,也更能高效地利用有限的公共資源,從根本上破解香港的充電困局,將香港轉型為一個主動的、引領行業發展的智慧出行和綠色能源管理方案的「國際櫥窗」。

[1] 寬減電動車首次登記稅:私家車登記車主如符合條件,可考慮於計劃期間(即2018年2月28日至2026年3月31日,包括首尾兩天),安排拆毀及取消其名下的一輛“舊私家車”的登記,然後再以其名義首次登記“2018年2月28日”的登記,然後再以其名義首次登記“2018年”

[2] 香港特別行政區政府運輸署交通運輸資料月報,表4.4

[3] 香港環境保護署:香港主要公共電動車充電樁參考數據庫;深圳市發展與改革委員會:截至今年6月底,全市已建成投用超充站1057座、充電樁超48.7萬個。

[4] 香港特別行政區政府運輸署交通運輸資料月報,表4.4

[5]香港環保署EV屋苑充電易資助計畫步驟指引;深圳市福田區發展與改革局:先可透過「南網線上」APP或小程式進行線上申請充電樁用電報表安裝,需提供身分證明資料、物業產權合法證明資料(車位產權所屬證明或充電樁用電地址物權管理單位出具的安裝同意書),透過申請後供電局將現場裝填。

[6] 香港特區環保署:「EV屋苑充電易資助計劃」(資助計劃)預留給已收到的申請的資助金額,已達35億元撥款的上限,並已於二零二三年十二月三十一日停止接受申請。

[7] 香港工會聯合會:工聯會議員團隊與香港電動車充電關注組籲政府優化電動車充電 助香港達碳中和 《香港電動車用家充電習慣意見調查》

[8] 香港環境保護署:香港主要公共電動車充電樁參考數據庫 2025年6月

[9] 香港環境保護署:香港主要公共電動車充電樁參考數據庫 2025年6月

[10] 深圳政府線上深圳特區報/生態環境部宣傳教育中心:《深圳「綠色公車」模式將在189個國家推廣》、《深圳:提供城市公共服務領域機動車電動化的「中國方案」》

[11] 香港環境與生態局:《行政長官2024年施政報告》宣布政府會投入三億元推出高速充電樁鼓勵計劃,目標是提供3 000支高速充電樁,以額外支援約16萬輛電動車,預計所有高速充電樁陸續由2026年至2028年年底投入服務。

萬智璽 教授
港大經管學院創新及資訊管理學教授
港大經管學院創新及資訊管理學學術領域主任

(本文同時於二零二五年十二月十日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)