Global Growth: Stuck in Low Gear

Global growth is stuck in low gear. Just as a car stuck in low gear can only reach a fraction of its potential speed, the global economy is failing to find its former momentum.


Prof. Steven Barnett

Global growth is stuck in low gear. Just as a car stuck in low gear can only reach a fraction of its potential speed, the global economy is failing to find its former momentum. The engine is running, but the structural transmission of growth—productivity—is failing to shift upward.

Evidence of the Slowdown

The clearest way to see this is by comparing recent trends with the pre-pandemic era. For the two decades before 2020, the global economy grew at an average annual rate of 3.7 percent. In contrast, for the past two years, growth has hovered at approximately 3.3 percent—a full half-percentage point below the historical norm.

This performance is even more concerning when we consider the massive “scars” left by the pandemic. By 2024, the global economy was 3 percent smaller than it would have been without the shock of COVID-19. This 3 percent gap represents approximately $3.3 trillion in lost output for 2024 alone–a sum larger than the annual GDP of most major nations.

Normally, the years following a major shock see a “catch-up” period of faster-than-average growth as the economy recovers lost ground. This has not happened. Instead of closing the gap, the world is falling further behind. While advanced economies have shown some resilience—the US, in particular, has outperformed forecasts—the scarring is especially large in Emerging Market and Developing Economies. Those least able to afford it have been the hardest hit, lacking the policy space and fiscal buffers to cushion the blow.

The Medium-Term Outlook

The forecast offers little relief. For the 2024-2030 period, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) projects global growth to average just 3.2 percent. This data, a combination of the latest near-term (International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. (2026)) and medium-term forecasts (International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. (2025)), is the lowest on record. Not only is it slower than pre-pandemic, but it is stuck at the lowest pace since the IMF started publishing medium-term forecasts in the 1990s. The “low gear” isn’t a temporary stall; it appears to be the new cruising speed.

Why Is It Stuck? The Role of Productivity

Economic growth theory provides a direct explanation for this slowdown: declining growth in total factor productivity (TFP). If we think of the global economy as a factory, output can grow by adding more machines (capital), more workers (labor), or by using those inputs better (productivity).

Even before the pandemic, economists were sounding the alarm. In “Gone with the Headwinds” (Adler et al. (2017)), researchers emphasized that structural headwinds were already dragging down global productivity and highlighted, foreshadowing what comes below, the importance of trade. Productivity gains come from two sources: innovation and the better allocation of resources. While innovation (like AI) is more intuitive, the role of resource allocation is often under-appreciated.

The allocation argument is straightforward: if resources flow from low-productivity activities to high-productivity ones, output increases even without a technological breakthrough. A textbook example is China in the 2000s. China’s rapid GDP growth was fueled by the flow of labor out of low-productivity farming into much higher-productivity manufacturing. The same worker produced much more in a factory than on a farm, and as a result, national productivity took off.

The IMF’s research on the “Slowdown in Global Medium-Term Growth” (International Monetary Fund. Research Department (2024)) highlights the importance of of this allocation of resources argument. It finds that structural reforms to better allocate resources are among the most effective ways to boost medium-term growth.

The Trade Headwind

This brings us to a current problem. Historically, trade was a catalyst for productivity. Trade allows countries to specialize in what they do best and, thus, directly promotes a better allocation of resources. Trade also exposes domestic industries to foreign competition, sparking innovation that boosts productivity. Thus, it provides the pressure and the opportunity to move resources to their most productive uses.

Today, that engine is being throttled. Trade restrictions–tariffs, export bans, and “buy local” requirements–are rising sharply. Consequently, trade as a share of global GDP has flatlined. In advanced economies, the growth rate of trade has fallen by nearly half since the 2008 financial crisis.

When trade retreats, so does the efficiency of resource allocation. Fixing this will be difficult. To varying extents, trade restrictions are motivated not by economic efficiency but by national security concerns. Lost efficiency, for example by replicating global supply chains onshore, is a “resilience tax” in the form of slower growth that some countries are choosing to pay.

Conclusion

The global economy is stuck in low gear. Growth has been disappointing and is forecast to continue to disappoint through the medium term. Moreover, this sluggishness is on top of a world still bearing large economic scars from the pandemic. The solution ultimately rests with boosting productivity—through innovation and, under-appreciated, through better allocation of resources. Rising trade barriers, unfortunately, add a big headwind to boosting productivity. Thus, without a reinvigoration of trade, the global economy is likely to remain stuck in low gear.

References

Adler, Gustavo, Romain A Duval, Davide Furceri, Ksenia Koloskova, and Marcos Poplawski Ribeiro. 2017. “Gone with the Headwinds: Global Productivity.” Staff Discussion Notes (USA) 2017 (004): A001. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475589672.006.A001.

International Monetary Fund. Research Department. 2024. “Chapter 3 Slowdown in Global Medium-Term Growth.” In World Economic Outlook, April 2024, CH003. USA: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400255892.081.CH003.

International Monetary Fund. Research Dept. 2025. World Economic Outlook, October 2025: Global Economy in Flux, Prospects Remain Dim. USA: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229023948.081.

———. 2026. World Economic Update, January 2026: Global Economy: Steady Amid Divergent Forces. USA: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229032339.081.

Translation

全球增長:陷入 「低速擋」 困局

全球經濟正陷入 「低速擋」 困局,宛如一輛縱使深踩油門也難以提速的車,全球經濟始終難尋往日的成長動能。引擎還在轟鳴,但拉動成長的 「變速箱」 —— 生產率,卻已經失靈。

失速的表現

觀察這一趨勢最直觀的方式,是將近期趨勢與疫情前時代進行對比。在2020年之前的二十年裏,全球經濟以年均3.7%的速度成長。相比之下,過去兩年的成長率一直在約3.3%徘徊——比歷史常態低了整整半個百分點。

如果我們再考慮到疫情留下的巨大「傷疤」,這種表現就更加令人擔憂。到2024年,全球經濟規模比沒有發生新冠疫情衝擊的情況下縮小了3%。這代表僅2024一年就有約3.3兆美元的產出損失——這一數字超過了全球大多數主要經濟體的全年GDP。

正常情況下,重大沖擊過後應出現一段 「追趕期」,增速會高於平均水準。但這一次,現實卻是世界經濟非但沒有彌合差距,反而進一步掉隊。儘管發達經濟體表現出了一定的韌性,尤其是美國的表現超出了預期,但新興市場和發展中經濟體由於缺乏政策空間和財政緩衝來減輕打擊,反而受創最深。

中期展望

目前的預測並不樂觀。國際貨幣基金組織預計,2024年至2030年間,全球平均成長率僅爲3.2%。這一數據結合了最新短期預測和中期預測,爲有記錄以來的最低值。它不僅比疫情前更慢,更是自1990年代國際貨幣基金組織開始發佈中期預測以來的最低點。「低速擋」或許已不再是暫時的放緩,而正在演變爲一種 「新常態」 。

爲何失速?癥結在於生產率

成長經濟學理論爲此提供了直接解釋:全要素生產率 (TFP)的增速在下降。如果將全球經濟想像成一家工廠,產出成長可以通過增加機器(資本)、工人(勞動力),或者更好地利用這些投入(生產率)來實現。

早在疫情之前,經濟學家們就已敲響警鐘。在古斯塔沃•阿德勒(Gustavo Adler)2017年發表的《逆風飄搖:全球生產率》一文中,研究人員強調,結構性阻力已在拖累全球生產率,並預示了(下文將談到的)貿易的重要性。生產率的提升來自兩方面:創新和資源配置優化。雖然創新(如人工智慧)的成果更爲直觀,但資源配置的作用往往被低估。

資源配置促進生產率的邏輯很簡單:如果資源從低生產率活動流向高生產率活動,即使沒有技術突破,產出也會增加。一個典型的例子是本世紀頭十年的中國,當時中國GDP的快速成長,受益於資源配置的優化,即勞動力從低生產率的農業部門向高產出的製造業領域大規模轉移。同一個勞動力,在工廠流水線上創造的產值,遠高於在自家地裏種田,國家生產率得以騰飛。

國際貨幣基金組織2024年關於「全球中期成長放緩」的研究也強調了資源配置的重要性。研究發現,優化資源配置的結構性改革,是提振中期成長最有效的方式之一。

貿易逆風的掣肘

從歷史上看,貿易是生產率的催化劑。貿易使各國能夠深耕自己最擅長的領域,直接促進和優化了資源配置。貿易還使國內產業暴露於與外國競爭之下,激發創新,進而提升生產率。因此,它爲最高效的使用資源提供了動力和機遇。

如今,這臺成長引擎正在被人爲掣肘。隨著關稅、出口禁令和 「購買本土產品」等貿易限制措施的激增,貿易佔全球GDP的比重停滯不前。在發達經濟體,貿易成長率自2008年金融危機以來已下降了近一半。

當貿易退潮,資源配置的效率也隨之下降,修復這個問題將十分困難,目前許多貿易限制更多出於 「國家安全」而非經濟效率的考量。將全球供應鏈遷回本土所帶來的效率損失,實則就是一些國家爲了增強韌性而選擇的代價——即以犧牲成長爲代價換取所謂的安全,這被稱爲 「韌性稅」。

結語

全球經濟深陷 「低速擋」困局。過去一段時間的成長令人失望,而展望中期,這份失望恐怕還將延續。此外,在世界仍承載著疫情巨大經濟創傷的背景下,成長乏力的態勢恐將延續。通過創新以及(經常被低估的)優化資源配置來提振生產率,纔是最終的解決方案。但目前,不斷築起的貿易壁壘給提振生產率構成了巨大阻礙。若無法重振貿易活力,全球經濟恐將持續低速。

Steven Alan Barnett教授
港大經管學院經濟學實務教授

(本文同時於二零二六年三月十七日載於《FT中文網》明德商論專欄)