Four Takeaways from London’s Experiences for Hong Kong’s Economic Transformation

In the wake of the Second World War, London underwent a profound transformation from a global trade port to an offshore financial centre. In 1964, the city was one of Europe’s three largest ports, handling up to 61.3 million tonnes of cargo. However, by the 1980s, with the advent of large ocean-going vessels and container…


Professor Heiwai Tang and Mr Beining Liu

18 June 2025

In the wake of the Second World War, London underwent a profound transformation from a global trade port to an offshore financial centre. In 1964, the city was one of Europe’s three largest ports, handling up to 61.3 million tonnes of cargo. However, by the 1980s, with the advent of large ocean-going vessels and container technology, its enclosed wharves could no longer adapt to the new shipping demands, both geographically and in terms of facilities. As a result, with its cargo handling volume drastically reduced to 25 million tonnes, London lost its crown as a leading regional port.

To address the pressures of transformation, the UK capital demonstrated outstanding adaptability. In 1982, the London Docklands was designated an enterprise zone and a dedicated development corporation was established, attracting £720 million worth of private capital for the development of modern infrastructure and service industries. In the 1990s, with the completion of the Docklands and the Canary Wharf in particular, a large number of multinational headquarters were set up, giving rise to the networks of high-efficiency logistics, warehousing, and financial services in the area. Gradually reducing reliance on traditional freight transport, London evolved into a diversified centre for services and finance worldwide.

By continuing to attract multinational investment and the relocation of corporate headquarters, London has not only moved away from reliance on local cargo transport, but has also succeeded in maintaining its vitality and strategic value as a global hub for the flow of capital, data, and professional services. London’s offshore status has provided the city with greater institutional and legal flexibility, allowing it to rapidly adapt its policies to changes in global markets and to lower the costs of corporate establishment and operations. Especially after the Brexit, London has beefed up financial and trade cooperation with non-EU markets and actively sought to enhance its influence in emerging markets and under multilateral frameworks, further expanding its international connectivity. Furthermore, London’s highly open information flows and judicially sound environment have also contributed to its appeal as a cluster for data, legal, and technological services, enabling its upgrading and transformation from “goods flows” to “knowledge flows” and “capital flows”.

Likewise, Hong Kong is at a similar crossroads today. According to data from the Census and Statistics Department, local private consumption experienced a 1.6% year-on-year decline in the first quarter of 2025. The consumption market showed contraction while the economic structure apparently exhibits homogeneity. Despite efforts to promote technological innovation, data fusion, and economic diversification, the Hong Kong SAR Government has faced challenges in terms of policy flexibility, financial innovation capabilities, location use efficiency, and the integration of comprehensive services.

In the process of planning its future, Hong Kong must perform an integrated analysis of such elements as historical factors, market dynamics, and the geopolitical landscape. To maintain and enhance its influence in the global economic system, Hong Kong must proactively seek transformation, synergizing its competitive advantages into policymaking and strategic deployment. Taking a leaf from London’s experiences, Hong Kong is likely to seal its place as a new hub in the international supply chain. We recommend focusing on the following four areas.

Flexible policies and all-round services

A flexible and highly efficient policy environment is a prerequisite for success in transformation. The financial Big Bang in 1986 marks the turning point in London’s financial reform. By relaxing financial regulations, the British regulators introduced market mechanisms and opened up the services sector, providing an immediate stimulus to the financial market. London soon drew in a large number of international financial institutions, reinforcing its status as a hub in the world’s financial system. Data from the City of London demonstrated that, as a result of the reform, the number of international banks in the city expanded considerably and financial transactions became much more active.

Having long upheld the principle of “big market, small government”, Hong Kong boasts a well-established financial regulatory system, which epitomizes its systemic advantage as a solid foundation for the transformation. To further increase its competitive edge in the international supply chain services market, Hong Kong should emulate London’s approach and strengthen professional support in legal, tax, and business consulting services, especially to address the increasingly complex cross-boundary compliance requirements in high value-added supply chain management.

In addition, to enhance policy transparency and market confidence, a clear and well-defined policy expectations mechanism is equally indispensable. For instance, reports on policy and industry trends can be released on a regular basis by the Census and Statistics Department, similar to the information disclosure and market communication mechanisms implemented during the initial stage of the London reform. This not only helps to win market trust but also serves to boost Hong Kong’s coordinating capabilities within the service economy.

Golden opportunity for financial innovation

During the Cold War, to circumvent US financial regulations, the Soviet Bloc countries deposited US dollars into banks in London, which contributed to the development of an active Eurodollar market. By the end of the 1970s, London accounted for over 25% of worldwide Eurodollar business transactions, laying the foundation for its status as an international capital hub. By the same token, Hong Kong can leverage its unique geopolitical and systemic advantages to further promote the internationalization of the RMB in global finance and trade.

Recent years have witnessed a climbing share of the RMB in the foreign-exchange reserves of central banks. Due to its close ties with the Chinese mainland, Hong Kong has emerged as the world’s largest offshore RMB trading centre. According to data from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), as of the end of April 2025, the total RMB deposits in Hong Kong amounted to RMB1.0309 trillion. To capitalize on this advantage, Hong Kong must accelerate financial innovation by fostering the creation of digital platforms and optimizing cross-border payment systems. These measures will bolster the RMB’s role in international trade and investment.

As a matter of fact, Hong Kong has no shortage of initiatives in financial technology. The stablecoin regulatory regime places the SAR as one of the first jurisdictions to establish a licensing framework for stablecoin issuers, thereby expanding Hong Kong’s influence in the digital financial arena. Against the backdrop of surging geopolitical uncertainty and growing demand for non-US asset allocation, the stablecoin regulatory regime offers Hong Kong an opportunity for institutional innovation. This new initiative will appeal to international investors seeking diversified assets and risk mitigation options and elevating Hong Kong’s status as a capital intermediary platform. At the same time, many international AI companies that have newly set up operations here are facilitating the extension of cutting-edge technologies such as blockchain and remote sensing to financial services. Additionally, the HKMA has also proactively expanded the digital RMB and mBridge projects to pave the way for the RMB internationalization through institutional measures.

By deepening financial cooperation networks with Middle Eastern and ASEAN countries, Hong Kong can further currency exchange, align financial products, and foster a supply chain financing ecosystem. These measures will help to build a financial services system characterized by technological advantages and systemic flexibility, empowering Hong Kong to take greater strategic initiative in global supply chain finance.

Leveraging strategic location for global connectivity

Boasting a unique strategic location between Europe and North America, within the Greenwich time zone, and spanning the trading hours of the three continents of Asia, Europe, and North America, London is naturally endowed as a global, round-the-clock financial and trade centre.

As China’s important gateway to the world, with the Mainland at its back and Southeast Asia to the east, Hong Kong is geographically well positioned to develop into a regional supply chain and trade services hub. Benefitting from the continued advancement of the Belt and Road Initiative, the city’s role in cooperation among related countries has gained more prominence. Furthermore, its active pursuit of membership in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) has provided Hong Kong with greater opportunities for market access and service expansion.

At the institutional level, Hong Kong has also proved notable integration capabilities. The signing of the Convention on the Establishment of the International Organization for Mediation in May 2025 signifies Hong Kong’s milestone in the global legal service system. Harnessing its common law system and bilingual (Chinese and English) environment under the “One Country, Two Systems” framework, the city will incorporate an international mediation mechanism into the supply chain system to deliver high value-added services for the resolution of cross-border disputes. Consequently, Hong Kong will not only secure a place among traditional logistic nodes but is poised to emerge as an international legal and business services hub, paralleling London’s historical development.

A two-way development hub serving the world

The success of London hinges not only on its financial prowess but also on its standing in cross-border trade and capital flows. Since the 1970s, London has, through its flexible financial policies, become both a magnet for foreign funds and a prime destination for company headquarters. Its highly efficient, mutually complementary financial market and port logistics systems have provided enterprises with a wide range of services spanning financing, logistics, and management support.

Hong Kong is ideally positioned to develop a similar “twin hub”. As Asia’s leading financial centre, the city boasts a highly open financial system and a solid foundation in ports, airports, logistics, and warehousing. Looking ahead, Hong Kong can, through systematic advancement of supply chain management and service upgrading, support enterprises in optimizing processes and controlling costs, thereby attracting more multinational companies to establish regional headquarters and management centres here.

Regarding offshore RMB financing and trade settlement, it would be advisable for Hong Kong to draw on London’s experience by utilizing its world-class financial and infrastructural facilities to render integrated services for multinational corporations. Hong Kong has already been exploring the innovative use of central bank digital currencies in cross-border payments in collaboration with United Arab Emirates, Thailand, and other countries. Such collaborations can enhance the value-added of financial services and improve global network connectivity.

Besides, Hong Kong should encourage local professional services institutions to deepen their connections with international markets. The creation of industry ecosystems in areas such as supply chain management, risk control, and tax consulting, will enable the city to evolve from a service platform to a management hub, transforming into a strategic node for international enterprises seeking to penetrate the Asia-Pacific market.

In essence, amidst the increasingly complex backdrop of the global economy and geopolitics, Hong Kong now stands at a critical juncture of strategic adjustment. Inspired by London’s successful transformation from a traditional port city to a modern financial and services centre, Hong Kong can put in place reforms across multiple synergistic dimensions, including systems, services, and technology. Beyond encouraging policy flexibility, it is essential to increase supply chain service capabilities, expand room for the RMB internationalization, and capitalize on geographic and institutional advantages to build systematic and multifunctional international services platforms.

In the long run, Hong Kong should not only reinforce its status as an international financial centre but also redefine its fundamental role on the world economic stage, fully supported by high value-added supply chain services. We believe that Hong Kong is perfectly capable of leapfrogging from a trading entrepot to a management hub through a profound transformation and continuing to play an irreplaceable role in the global economy.

Translation
第二次世界大戰後,倫敦經歷了從全球貿易港口到離岸金融中心的深刻轉型。1964年,倫敦位居歐洲三大港口之一,處理貨物量高達6130萬噸;但至1980年代,隨着大型遠洋船舶和集裝箱技術的普及,當地封閉式碼頭在地理與設施上均難以適應新型貨運需求,貨物處理量大降至2500萬噸,倫敦港口因而失落領導地位。

為應對轉型壓力,倫敦展現出卓越的適應能力。1982年,倫敦船塢區(London Docklands)被劃為企業區,並成立發展公司,吸引了約7.2億英鎊的私人資本,用於建設現代基礎設施和引入服務業。1990年代,重建完成的船塢區,特別是金絲雀碼頭(Canary Wharf),更吸引大量跨國公司總部進駐,並發展出高效的物流、倉儲與金融服務網路。倫敦逐步擺脫對傳統貨運的依賴,邁向多元化的全球服務與金融中心。

通過持續吸納跨國資本與企業設點,倫敦不僅擺脫了對本地實體貨物流的依賴,也成功維持了其作為全球資金、數據與專業服務流動樞紐的活力與戰略價值。離岸地位賦予倫敦更大的制度與稅務靈活性,使其能迅速調整政策以適應全球市場變化,並降低企業設立與運營成本。特別是在脫歐後,倫敦更加強調與非歐洲市場的金融與貿易合作,積極擴展其在新興市場與多邊框架下的影響力,進一步鞏固其全球網絡連接能力。此外,倫敦高度開放的資訊流通與法治環境,也提升了其作為資料、法務與技術服務集散地的吸引力,實現從「貨物流」向「知識流」與「資本流」的升級轉型。

今天的香港正面臨類似的轉折點。根據政府統計處數據,2025年首季,本地私人消費同比下降1.6%,消費市場呈現萎縮態勢,經濟結構亦顯單一。特區政府雖積極推動科技創新和數據融合,努力實現經濟多元化,但其間仍面臨政策靈活性、金融創新能力、區位運用效率與綜合服務整合等多重挑戰。

籌劃未來之際,香港必須綜合歷史、市場動能與地緣格局等因素,而要在世界經濟體系中維持並擴大影響力,更須主動謀求轉型,在政策制定與戰略部署上融合自身優勢。借鑑倫敦經驗,當可有望在環球供應鏈中打造新型樞紐地位,筆者建議聚焦下列四大範疇。
政策靈活  服務全面

彈性而高效的政策環境是轉型成功的先決條件。1986年「金融大爆炸」(financial Big Bang)是倫敦金融改革的重要節點。英國監管機構通過放寬金融管制、引入市場機制、開放服務領域,迅速激發了金融市場活力。倫敦隨即吸引了大批國際金融機構,強化了其在全球金融體系中的樞紐地位。倫敦金融城數據顯示,如此改革後,當地國際銀行數量大幅增加,金融交易顯著活躍。

香港長期奉行「大市場、小政府」理財原則,擁有成熟的金融監管制度,是制度優勢的集中體現,為進行轉型提供了良好基礎。要進一步鞏固在國際供應鏈服務市場中的競爭力,香港不妨效法倫敦,加強在法律、稅務、商業諮詢各方面的專業服務支援,尤其是高增值供應鏈管理中日益複雜的跨境合規需求。

此外,清晰明確的政策預期機制同樣不可或缺,以便提升政策透明度和市場信心。例如由香港統計處定期發布政策動態與行業趨勢報告,協助企業及時判斷政策走向,類似倫敦改革初期所採用的資訊公開與市場溝通機制,這既有助增強市場信任,也能擴充香港在服務型經濟中的協調能力。
金融創新  機不可失

冷戰時期,蘇聯集團國家出於規避美國金融監管的考慮,將美元存放於倫敦銀行體系,由此催生出活躍的歐洲美元市場。及至1970年代末,倫敦已吸納全球超過四分之一的歐洲美元業務量,奠定其作為國際資本匯聚地的基礎。香港也可充分利用其特殊的地緣與制度優勢,進一步在金融和貿易方面推動人民幣國際化。

近年來,人民幣在各國央行外匯儲備中的比重持續上升。香港憑藉與內地的緊密聯繫,已成為全球最大的離岸人民幣交易中心。根據香港金融管理局(金管局)數據,截至2025年4月底,人民幣存款總額達到10309億元。為擴大這一優勢,香港亟需加快金融創新步伐,推動數字化平台建設與跨境支付系統優化,拓寬人民幣在國際貿易與投資中的使用場景。

事實上,香港在金融科技一環已動作頻頻:近期推出的穩定幣監管制度,使香港躋身世界首批確立虛擬資產支付牌照的司法轄區之列,增強了其在數字金融領域的國際話語權。在當前地緣政治不確定性升高、全球對非美元資產配置需求日增的背景下,穩定幣制度亦為香港提供了一項制度創新的窗口,有助於吸引尋求多元資產避險選項的國際投資者,並加強其作為資金中介平台的地位。同時,多家國際人工智能企業前來落戶,帶動區塊鏈、遙感等前沿技術向金融服務延伸。金管局亦積極擴大數字人民幣與「多種央行數碼貨幣跨境網絡」(mBridge)項目,在制度上為人民幣國際化鋪路。

香港更可深化與中東、東盟等地區的金融合作網絡,推動更大範圍的貨幣互換與金融產品對接,培育供應鏈融資生態。這一系列舉措將有利於構建兼具技術優勢與制度彈性的金融服務體系,為本港在全球供應鏈金融領域爭取更大戰略主動。
善用地利  融入國際

倫敦的地理位置優勢不容忽視。位處歐洲與北美之間,歸入格林威治時區,可同步覆蓋亞歐美三大洲的交易時段,無疑是這座城市作為世界全天候金融兼貿易中心的天然條件。

香港作為中國通向世界的重要門戶,背靠內地,東臨東南亞,亦具備發展成為區域供應鏈與貿易服務中樞的地理優勢。隨着「一帶一路」倡議的持續推進,香港在與相關國家合作中的作用不斷增強;再者,積極申請加入《區域全面經濟夥伴關係協定》(RCEP)之餘,也帶來更廣泛的市場接入與服務擴展機會。

至於制度層面,香港亦展現出高度的融合能力。2025年5月,《國際調解院公約》在此落地簽署,標誌着香港在全球法律服務體系中邁出關鍵一步。憑藉「一國兩制」下的普通法體系和中英雙語環境,香港將國際調解機制引入供應鏈體系,為解決跨境爭議提供高附加值服務。由此,香港不僅在傳統物流節點中佔據一席之地,更有望升級為國際法律與商業服務樞紐,與倫敦的發展軌跡形成良性呼應。
雙向發展  服務四方

倫敦的成功不僅源於金融能力,也來自跨境貿易與資本流動方面的地位。自1970年代以來,倫敦通過靈活的金融政策招徠各地資本與企業總部落戶,其高效的金融市場與港口物流功能相輔相成,為企業提供涵蓋資金、物流與管理的系統服務。

香港完全擁有發展類似「雙重樞紐」的潛質。作為亞洲頂尖金融中心,其金融體系高度開放;在港口、機場、物流與倉儲方面亦具備堅固基礎。未來,香港更可通過系統化推進供應鏈管理與服務升級,幫助企業實現流程優化與成本控制,從而吸引更多跨國公司前來設立區域總部與管理中心。

在離岸人民幣融資與結算方面,香港尤其應借鑑倫敦經驗,以世界一流的金融與基礎設施,為跨國企業提供整合式服務。當前,香港已與阿聯酋、泰國等國家探索央行數字貨幣(CBDC)在跨境支付中的創新應用,這類協作可促進金融服務附加值及完善國際網絡聯通。

此外,香港應鼓勵本地專業服務機構深化與國際市場的連接。在供應鏈管理、風險控制、稅務諮詢等領域打造產業生態,使其從服務平台向管理中樞升級,而成為國際企業拓展亞太市場的戰略節點。

總的來說,在世界經濟與地緣政治日益複雜的背景下,香港正處於戰略調整的關鍵時期。借鑑倫敦從傳統港口城市向現代金融與服務中心的成功轉型經驗,香港可在制度、服務與科技等多個維度協同推進改革。在提升政策靈活性的同時,應強化供應鏈服務能力,擴大人民幣國際化空間,並充分發揮地理與制度優勢,構建系統化、多功能的跨國服務平台。

長遠而言,香港不僅應鞏固國際金融中心的地位,更應以高增值供應鏈服務為新支點,在全球經濟版圖中重塑核心角色。筆者相信,香港完全有能力通過一場深度轉型,實現從「貿易中轉」到「管理中樞」的躍升,在世界經濟體系中持續發揮不可替代的作用。
鄧希煒教授
港大經管學院副院長(對外事務)、馮國經馮國綸基金經濟學教授


劉貝寧
亞洲環球研究所研究員


(本文同時於二零二五年六月十八日載於《信報》「龍虎山下」專欄)